Smillie Luke D, Pickering Alan D, Jackson Chris J
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, New Cross, UK.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):320-35. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3.
In this article, we review recent modifications to Jeffrey Gray's (1973, 1991) reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST), and attempt to draw implications for psychometric measurement of personality traits. First, we consider Gray and McNaughton's (2000) functional revisions to the biobehavioral systems of RST. Second, we evaluate recent clarifications relating to interdependent effects that these systems may have on behavior, in addition to or in place of separable effects (e.g., Corr, 2001; Pickering, 1997). Finally, we consider ambiguities regarding the exact trait dimension to which Gray's "reward system" corresponds. From this review, we suggest that future work is needed to distinguish psychometric measures of (a) fear from anxiety and (b) reward-reactivity from trait impulsivity. We also suggest, on the basis of interdependent system views of RST and associated exploration using formal models, that traits that are based upon RST are likely to have substantial intercorrelations. Finally, we advise that more substantive work is required to define relevant constructs and behaviors in RST before we can be confident in our psychometric measures of them.
在本文中,我们回顾了对杰弗里·格雷(Jeffrey Gray,1973年,1991年)强化敏感性理论(RST)的近期修正,并试图探讨其对人格特质心理测量的启示。首先,我们考虑格雷和麦克诺顿(Gray and McNaughton,2000年)对RST生物行为系统的功能性修正。其次,除了这些系统对行为可能产生的可分离效应之外,或者作为可分离效应的替代,我们评估了近期有关这些系统可能对行为产生的相互依存效应的阐释(例如,科尔(Corr,2001年);皮克林(Pickering,1997年))。最后,我们考虑了格雷的“奖励系统”所对应的具体特质维度的模糊性。通过这次回顾,我们建议未来需要开展工作,以区分(a)恐惧与焦虑的心理测量指标,以及(b)奖励反应性与特质冲动性的心理测量指标。我们还基于RST的相互依存系统观点以及使用形式模型进行的相关探索提出,基于RST的特质可能具有显著的相互关联。最后,我们建议在能够对RST中的相关构念和行为进行自信的心理测量之前,需要开展更多实质性工作来定义它们。