相似文献
1
Should journals police scientific fraud?
Nature. 2006 Feb 2;439(7076):520-1. doi: 10.1038/439520a.
2
Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):24. doi: 10.1038/436024d.
3
[Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012 Aug;60(4):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2012.06.395. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
4
Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):209. doi: 10.1038/421209a.
5
Sitting in judgement.
Nature. 2002 Sep 26;419(6905):332-3. doi: 10.1038/419332a.
6
China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7709):171. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05359-8.
7
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?
Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003.
8
[Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Lakartidningen. 2006;103(43):3288-91.
9
Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):248-9. doi: 10.1038/439248b.
10
Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;8(2):101-2. doi: 10.1038/ncb0206-101.
引用本文的文献
1
Surgical publications: detecting and preventing fraud.
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Jul;92(7-8):1591-1592. doi: 10.1111/ans.17579.
2
Digital images are data: and should be treated as such.
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;931:1-27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_1.
Zotero 插件