相似文献
1
China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7709):171. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05359-8.
2
Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):24. doi: 10.1038/436024d.
3
Should journals police scientific fraud?
Nature. 2006 Feb 2;439(7076):520-1. doi: 10.1038/439520a.
4
Sitting in judgement.
Nature. 2002 Sep 26;419(6905):332-3. doi: 10.1038/419332a.
5
The 'self-plagiarism' oxymoron: can one steal from oneself?
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Mar;42(3):231-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02645.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
6
Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
Biomacromolecules. 2001 Spring;2(1):19A-21A.
7
Why we should reward peer reviewers.
Cardiovasc Res. 2018 Apr 1;114(5):e30-e31. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy050.
8
Plagiarize or perish?
Nat Med. 2006 May;12(5):494. doi: 10.1038/nm0506-494a.
9
China's clampdown on fake-paper factories picks up speed.
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7879):19-20. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02587-3.
10
[Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012 Aug;60(4):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2012.06.395. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
引用本文的文献
1
China's new strategy for fighting misconduct in academic journals.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Aug 5;132(15):1865-1866. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000347.
2
Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 May;15(3):320-344. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4119. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance.
Spinal Cord. 2018 Sep;56(9):821-822. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0193-9. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
Zotero 插件