[Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
作者信息
Pontille D, Torny D
机构信息
Anthropologie de l'écriture, boulevard Raspail, Paris, France.
出版信息
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012 Aug;60(4):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2012.06.395. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
PMID:22819062
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
[Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].[科学文章背后：界定欺诈类别与规范案例]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012 Aug;60(4):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2012.06.395. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
2
Should journals police scientific fraud?期刊应该监管科学欺诈行为吗？
Nature. 2006 Feb 2;439(7076):520-1. doi: 10.1038/439520a.
3
Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.加大处罚力度并进行高质量审核以打击抄袭行为。
Nature. 2005 Jul 7;436(7047):24. doi: 10.1038/436024d.
4
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?科学文献中的撤稿：研究造假的发生率在增加吗？
J Med Ethics. 2011 Apr;37(4):249-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040923. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
5
Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.医生承认《柳叶刀》研究是虚构的。
Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):248-9. doi: 10.1038/439248b.
6
[Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].[科研欺诈调查。瑞典研究理事会的声明规范性不足]
Lakartidningen. 2006;103(43):3288-91.
7
Beautification and fraud.美化与欺诈。
Nat Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;8(2):101-2. doi: 10.1038/ncb0206-101.
8
Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud?科学署名。第一部分。洞察科学欺诈的窗口？
Mutat Res. 2005 Jan;589(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003.
9
Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.伊朗部长陷入抄袭风波。
Nature. 2009 Oct 1;461(7264):578-9. doi: 10.1038/461578a.
10
A case of plagiarism: lessons for editors, authors, reviewers, readers, and plagiarists.一例抄袭事件：给编辑、作者、审稿人、读者及抄袭者的教训
Crit Care Nurse. 2014 Oct;34(5):12-6. doi: 10.4037/ccn2014786.
引用本文的文献
1
Writing for "International Orthopaedics": authorship, fraud, and ethical concerns.为《国际骨科学》撰稿：作者身份、欺诈及伦理问题。
Int Orthop. 2021 Oct;45(10):2461-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05226-8.
2
How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector.同行评审如何限制认知：知识领域的前沿
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 3;6:1706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01706. eCollection 2015.
Zotero 插件