在无布鲁氏菌的农场中，由于小肠结肠炎耶尔森氏菌O:9导致血清学反应出现假阳性，用于诊断牛布鲁氏菌病的血清学检测之间的特异性依赖性
Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
作者信息
Mainar-Jaime Raúl C, Muñoz Pilar M, de Miguel María J, Grilló María J, Marín Clara M, Moriyón Ignacio, Blasco José M
机构信息
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, WCVM, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4.
出版信息
Can Vet J. 2005 Oct;46(10):913-6.
Abstract
When brucellosis false positive serological reactions happen in cattle, the serial use of pairs of specificity-correlated serological tests (rose bengal, complement fixation, competitive ELISA) results in specificities lower than expected. In this situation, highly specific tests, such as the indirect ELISA used alone, may be more adequate than serial testing.
摘要
当牛群中出现布鲁氏菌病血清学假阳性反应时，连续使用一系列具有相关性特异性的血清学检测（虎红平板凝集试验、补体结合试验、竞争ELISA），其特异性会低于预期。在这种情况下，单独使用间接ELISA这类高特异性检测可能比连续检测更为合适。
相似文献
1
2
Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Jan;12(1):141-51. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.1.141-151.2005.
3
Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Vet Microbiol. 1999 Apr 19;66(3):223-33. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00010-3.
4
Development and validation of a competitive ELISA kit for the serological diagnosis of ovine, caprine and bovine brucellosis.
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006 Dec;53(10):494-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00971.x.
5
An evaluation of ELISA using recombinant Brucella abortus bacterioferritin (Bfr) for bovine brucellosis.
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;45:16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests.
Vet Microbiol. 1996 Jan;48(1-2):101-12. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00153-0.
7
Validation of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibody against Brucella abortus in cattle sera using an automated ELISA workstation.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2002 Mar;69(1):61-77.
8
Brucella melitensis B115-based ELISA to unravel false positive serologic reactions in bovine brucellosis: a field study.
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Feb 11;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02278-7.
9
A new homogeneous assay for high throughput serological diagnosis of brucellosis in ruminants.
J Immunol Methods. 2008 Aug 20;337(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
10
False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.
Vet Res. 1997 Jul-Aug;28(4):375-83.
引用本文的文献
1
Large-scale evaluation of bacteriological-based method and qPCR performance for Brucellosis diagnosis in livestock using Bayesian latent class analysis.
Vet Q. 2025 Dec;45(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2025.2514753. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Exploring potential cytokine profiles as diagnostic biomarkers for brucellosis in Mediterranean Buffaloes.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 May 8;12:1583858. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1583858. eCollection 2025.
3
Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in Haryana, India: A Study Using Rose Bengal Plate Test and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.
Pathogens. 2025 Apr 10;14(4):373. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14040373.
4
DNA Sensor for the Detection of spp. Based on Magnetic Nanoparticle Markers.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 8;24(24):17272. doi: 10.3390/ijms242417272.
5
Serological and molecular prevalence of spp. among livestock species in Rajasthan, India.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Jul 17;10:1157211. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1157211. eCollection 2023.
6
Seroprevalence and assessment of public awareness of Brucella spp., Toxoplasma gondii and Chlamydia abortus in small ruminants from selected smallholder commercial farms of Zimbabwe.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287902. eCollection 2023.
7
Herd and animal level seroprevalence and associated risk factors of bovine brucellosis in different agro-ecologies of southwest Ethiopia.
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 1;9(6):e16852. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16852. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Evaluation of serological diagnostic tests for bovine brucellosis in dairy cattle herds in an endemic area: a multicenter study.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Mar 1;55(2):104. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03519-1.
9
Epidemiological investigation of brucellosis in breeding female cattle under the traditional production system of Jimma zone in Ethiopia.
Vet Anim Sci. 2020 May 16;9:100117. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2020.100117. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Seroprevalence and associated risk factors for chlamydiosis, coxiellosis and brucellosis in sheep and goats in Borana pastoral area, southern Ethiopia.
BMC Vet Res. 2020 May 20;16(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02360-0.
本文引用的文献
1
Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Jan;12(1):141-51. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.1.141-151.2005.
2
Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.
Vet Microbiol. 2004 May 20;100(1-2):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.12.010.
3
How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing.
Vet Microbiol. 2002 Dec 20;90(1-4):461-77. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00230-4.
4
Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology.
Vet Microbiol. 2002 Dec 20;90(1-4):447-59. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(02)00229-8.
5
Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases.
Prev Vet Med. 2000 May 30;45(1-2):107-22. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00119-7.
6
Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests.
Prev Vet Med. 2000 May 30;45(1-2):3-22. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00114-8.
7
Evaluation of lipopolysaccharides and polysaccharides of different epitopic structures in the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of brucellosis in small ruminants and cattle.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998 Nov;5(6):749-54. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.5.6.749-754.1998.
8
False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.
Vet Res. 1997 Jul-Aug;28(4):375-83.
9
The Brucellin skin test as a tool to discriminate false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis.
Vet Res. 1997 Jul-Aug;28(4):365-74.
Zotero 插件