Fischer Peter, Greitemeyer Tobias, Kastenmüller Andreas, Jonas Eva, Frey Dieter
Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;32(3):365-77. doi: 10.1177/0146167205282738.
It was hypothesized that intrinsic religiousness helps to cope with increased salience of terrorism. Intrinsically religious and non-religious participants were told that it is highly probable or highly improbable, respectively, that terrorist attacks will occur in Germany. High probability of terrorism only negatively affected the mood of non-religious participants but not of intrinsically religious participants (Study 1). Using as a realistic context of investigation the terrorist suicide bombings in Istanbul, the authors replicated this finding and shed some light on the underlying psychological processes (Study 2): On the day of the terrorist attacks (high salience of terrorism), non-religious participants experienced less positive emotions and less self-efficacy than did intrinsically religious participants. Two months later (low salience of terrorism), no differences were found between non-religious and intrinsically religious participants with regard to mood and self-efficacy. Mediational analyses suggested that the mood effects were associated with differences in the reported sense of self-efficacy.
研究假设认为,内在宗教信仰有助于应对恐怖主义凸显性的增加。分别告知具有内在宗教信仰和无宗教信仰的参与者,恐怖袭击在德国发生的可能性很高或很低。恐怖主义的高可能性仅对无宗教信仰参与者的情绪产生负面影响,而对具有内在宗教信仰的参与者则没有影响(研究1)。作者以伊斯坦布尔的恐怖自杀式爆炸事件作为现实调查背景,重复了这一发现,并揭示了潜在的心理过程(研究2):在恐怖袭击发生当天(恐怖主义凸显性高),无宗教信仰的参与者比具有内在宗教信仰的参与者体验到更少的积极情绪和更低的自我效能感。两个月后(恐怖主义凸显性低),在情绪和自我效能感方面,无宗教信仰和具有内在宗教信仰的参与者之间没有发现差异。中介分析表明,情绪效应与所报告的自我效能感差异有关。