van Bokhoven I, Matthys W, van Goozen St H M, van Engeland H
Dept. of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, B01-324, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;15(2):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s00787-006-0490-2. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
Although several studies have been conducted on the longitudinal course of childhood disruptive behaviours in community samples and in general psychiatric samples, little is known about adolescent adjustment in psychiatrically treated disruptive behaviour disorder (DBD) children. We examined a sample of adolescents (n = 47) who had been treated as children in an in-patient and/or day-treatment setting because of their severely disruptive behaviour. At follow-up, we found that half of the adolescents had a DBD diagnosis, and on average higher numbers of participants ever used soft drugs, had ever been in court, were not attending school when this was mandatory, and were smoking on a daily basis, as compared to comparison groups. There was, however, a large variance among the adolescents of our sample. When outcome was defined in terms of DBD diagnosis, living status, delinquency, school attendance, and smoking behaviour, 38 % had a positive outcome and 34 % had a poor outcome. For clinical purposes, it is important to recognise that there are large individual differences in outcome.
尽管已经针对社区样本和一般精神科样本中儿童破坏性行为的纵向病程开展了多项研究,但对于接受精神科治疗的破坏性行为障碍(DBD)儿童的青少年适应情况却知之甚少。我们对一组青少年(n = 47)进行了研究,这些青少年在儿童时期因严重破坏性行为而接受过住院和/或日间治疗。在随访时,我们发现一半的青少年被诊断为患有DBD,与对照组相比,平均有更多的参与者曾使用过软性毒品、曾上过法庭、在义务教育阶段未上学且每天吸烟。然而,我们样本中的青少年之间存在很大差异。当根据DBD诊断、生活状况、犯罪行为、上学出勤率和吸烟行为来定义结果时,38%的人结果良好,34%的人结果不佳。出于临床目的,认识到结果存在很大的个体差异很重要。