Nasterlack Michael
Department of Occupational Medicine and Health Protection, BASF AG, 67056, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Aug;79(7):536-44. doi: 10.1007/s00420-006-0086-7. Epub 2006 Feb 4.
Epidemiological studies have reported associations between childhood cancer and either parental or child exposure to pesticides. Reviews have been published in 1997 and 1998, where the evidence was found suggestive but not conclusive. An update of the current state of knowledge is warranted.
A literature search has been conducted to identify and evaluate new research results on this topic issued between 1998 and 2004.
Eighteen new studies have been identified for this review. Collectively, the studies suggest an increase in the risk of different cancer types associated with exposure to pesticides. However, the evidence is conflicting with regard to cancer types as well as to causative factors across studies. The major shortcomings concern exposure assessment, where, e.g., "farming" is treated equal to "exposure to pesticides," disregarding other possible exposures, e.g., to biological or infectious agents, and hitherto unidentified lifestyle factors. Also, many exposure questionnaires used in case-control studies are based on broad and sometimes implausible categories. In most studies exposures were categorized as "ever vs. never," with no regard for exposure intensity or duration.
The available literature does not allow firm conclusions with regard to pesticides and any type of childhood cancer. Investing in the acquisition and critical review of exposure information appears to be the crucial step for causal assessment in future research. However, focusing on the presence of pesticides, and not asking the question why they were used, might mask relevant associations to other causative agents.
流行病学研究报告了儿童癌症与父母或儿童接触杀虫剂之间的关联。1997年和1998年已发表相关综述,当时发现证据具有提示性但不具有决定性。有必要对当前的知识状况进行更新。
进行了文献检索,以识别和评估1998年至2004年间发表的关于该主题的新研究结果。
本次综述共识别出18项新研究。总体而言,这些研究表明接触杀虫剂会增加患不同类型癌症的风险。然而,关于癌症类型以及不同研究中的致病因素,证据存在矛盾。主要缺点在于暴露评估,例如,将“务农”等同于“接触杀虫剂”,而忽略了其他可能的暴露,如接触生物或传染因子以及迄今未确定的生活方式因素。此外,病例对照研究中使用的许多暴露问卷基于宽泛且有时不合理的类别。在大多数研究中,暴露被分类为“曾经接触与从未接触”,而不考虑暴露强度或持续时间。
现有文献无法就杀虫剂与任何类型的儿童癌症得出确凿结论。投资获取和批判性审查暴露信息似乎是未来研究中因果评估的关键步骤。然而,仅关注杀虫剂的存在,而不探究其使用原因,可能会掩盖与其他致病因素的相关关联。