• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动性理论中的注意与前注意

Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity.

作者信息

Logan G D

机构信息

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):317-39.

PMID:1621884
Abstract

The theoretical relation between preattentive processes and automatic processes is different in different approaches to attention and automaticity. In the modal view, automatic and preattentive processes are one and the same; automatic processing is preattentive. In recent views that treat automaticity as a memory phenomenon, automatic processing is postattentive. These views are described and evidence for them is discussed. Two experiments are reported that test whether the training that makes processing automatic also makes it preattentive. The data suggest a dissociation between automatic and preattentive processes that is more consistent with the memory view of automaticity than with the modal view.

摘要

前注意过程与自动过程之间的理论关系在不同的注意和自动性研究方法中有所不同。在传统观点中,自动过程和前注意过程是同一回事;自动加工是前注意的。在最近将自动性视为一种记忆现象的观点中,自动加工是后注意的。本文描述了这些观点并讨论了支持它们的证据。报告了两项实验,测试使加工具有自动性的训练是否也使其具有前注意性。数据表明自动过程和前注意过程之间存在分离,这与自动性的记忆观点比与传统观点更一致。

相似文献

1
Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity.自动性理论中的注意与前注意
Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):317-39.
2
Automaticity and preattentive processing.
Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):341-62.
3
A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity.一种关于自动化的并行分布式处理方法。
Am J Psychol. 1992 Summer;105(2):239-69.
4
Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning.序列学习领域中编码与检索之间的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):118-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.118.
5
Automaticity and consciousness: is perceiving the word necessary for reading it?自主性与意识:阅读单词时必须感知该单词吗?
Am J Psychol. 1997 Fall;110(3):429-48.
6
Dissociating word frequency and age of acquisition: The Klein effect revived (and reversed).区分单词频率和习得年龄:克莱因效应再现(并反转)。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):919-24. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.919.
7
[Automatic information processing, the frontal system and blunted affect. From clinical dimensions to cognitive processes toward a psychobiological explanation of temperament].[自动信息处理、额叶系统与情感迟钝。从临床维度到认知过程,迈向气质的心理生物学解释]
Encephale. 1994 Sep-Oct;20(5):511-9.
8
Consistent mapping and automatic visual search: comparing persons with and without intellectual disability.一致性映射与自动视觉搜索:比较有和没有智力残疾的人。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004 Nov;48(Pt 8):746-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00594.x.
9
Item and attribute storage of pictures and words in memory.图片和文字在记忆中的项目与属性存储。
Am J Psychol. 1980 Dec;93(4):603-15.
10
Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.语义记忆的结构与衰退:一项神经心理学与计算研究。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):205-35. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205.

引用本文的文献

1
Humans, fish, spiders and bees inherited working memory and attention from their last common ancestor.人类、鱼类、蜘蛛和蜜蜂从它们最后的共同祖先那里继承了工作记忆和注意力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 6;13:937712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937712. eCollection 2022.
2
Pre-Attentional Effects on Global Precedence Processing in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Those with Typical Development on a Tablet-Based Modified Navon's Paradigm Task.基于平板电脑的改良纳冯范式任务中,自闭症谱系障碍儿童和发育正常儿童在整体优先性加工上的前注意效应
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;11(3):372. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030372.
3
How can caching explain automaticity?
缓存如何解释自动化?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Apr;30(2):407-420. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02191-0. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Visuo-Motor Feedback Modulates Neural Activities in the Medulla of the Honeybee, .视动反馈调节蜜蜂延脑的神经活动。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 7;41(14):3192-3203. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1824-20.2021. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
How Does the (Re)Presentation of Instructions Influence Their Implementation?指令的(重新)呈现方式如何影响其实施?
J Cogn. 2019 Apr 18;2(1):10. doi: 10.5334/joc.63.
6
The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.任务新颖性悖论:快速指令任务学习过程中对不灵活神经通路的灵活控制。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt A):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
7
Is Poor Working Memory a Transdiagnostic Risk Factor for Psychopathology?工作记忆不佳是否是精神病理学的一种跨诊断风险因素?
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Nov;45(8):1477-1490. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0219-8.
8
Alpha-band EEG activity in perceptual learning.感知学习中的阿尔法波段脑电图活动。
J Vis. 2015;15(10):7. doi: 10.1167/15.10.7.
9
Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus-response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials.新指令刺激-反应规则的反射性激活:来自停止试验中侧化准备电位的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):365-73. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0321-8.
10
The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing.N400 和晚期正成分(LPC)效应反映的是句子加工的受控制机制,而不是自动机制。
Brain Sci. 2012 Aug 14;2(3):267-97. doi: 10.3390/brainsci2030267.