Nuechterlein Keith H, Nasrallah Henry, Velligan Dawn
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Mar 14;51(2):401-421. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae051.
Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) negatively impacts daily functioning, quality of life, and recovery, yet effective pharmacotherapies and practical assessments for clinical practice are lacking. Despite the pivotal progress made with establishment of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) for clinical research, implementation of the full MCCB is too time-consuming and cost-ineffective for most clinicians in clinical practice.
Here we discuss current assessments in relation to delivery format (interview-based and performance-based), validity, ease of use for clinicians and patients, reliability/reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for clinical implementation. Key challenges and future opportunities for improving cognitive assessments are also presented.
Current assessments that require 30 min to complete would have value in clinical settings, but the associated staff training and time required might preclude their application in most clinical settings. Initial profiling of cognitive deficits may require about 30 min to assist in the selection of evidence-based treatments; follow-up monitoring with brief assessments (10-15 min in duration) to detect treatment-related effects on global cognition may complement this approach. Guidance on validated brief cognitive tests for the strategic monitoring of treatment effects on CIAS is necessary.
With increased advancements in technology-based and remote assessments, development of validated formats of remote and in-person assessment, and the necessary training models and infrastructure required for implementation, are likely to be of increasing clinical relevance for future clinical practice.
精神分裂症相关的认知障碍(CIAS)对日常功能、生活质量和康复产生负面影响,但缺乏有效的药物治疗方法和适用于临床实践的实用评估手段。尽管在建立用于临床研究的精神分裂症认知改善测量与治疗研究(MATRICS)共识认知成套测验(MCCB)方面取得了关键进展,但对于大多数临床医生而言,在临床实践中实施完整的MCCB耗时过长且成本效益不高。
在此,我们讨论了当前评估在实施形式(基于访谈和基于表现)、效度、临床医生和患者的易用性、信度/可重复性、成本效益以及临床实施适用性等方面的情况。还介绍了改善认知评估的关键挑战和未来机遇。
目前需要30分钟完成的评估在临床环境中可能具有价值,但相关的人员培训和所需时间可能会妨碍其在大多数临床环境中的应用。对认知缺陷进行初步概况分析可能需要约30分钟,以协助选择循证治疗方法;采用简短评估(时长10 - 15分钟)进行随访监测,以检测治疗对整体认知的相关影响,可作为这种方法的补充。对于CIAS治疗效果的战略监测,需要有关经过验证的简短认知测试的指导。
随着基于技术和远程评估的不断进步,开发经过验证的远程和现场评估形式以及实施所需的必要培训模式和基础设施,可能会在未来临床实践中具有越来越高的临床相关性。