LeBlanc Jaclyn M, Dasta Joseph F, Kane-Gill Sandra L
College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Mar;40(3):490-500. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E491. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
To review and critique evidence for the use of the bispectral index (BIS) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
A computer search of English-language articles in MEDLINE (1966-July 2005), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1971-July 2005), and Scientific Citation Index Expanded (1980-July 2005) was conducted. A manual search of abstracts was also performed using the key search terms BIS, sedation, and critical care.
Case series, letters, editorials, and clinical studies that evaluated BIS in ICU patients were considered for inclusion.
Nineteen studies comparing the BIS with sedation scales were evaluated, revealing that the BIS trends lower with increasing sedation. The BIS appeared to correlate better when sedation scores were grouped rather than individual values. However, correlations between BIS and subjective scales were low in most studies (r(2) 0.21-0.93). Additionally, there was poor correlation between drug dosage and the BIS. Randomized, controlled trials demonstrating improved outcomes with BIS monitoring have not been reported.
Interpreting literature on the usefulness of the BIS in the ICU is difficult for reasons that include heterogeneous populations, different methods of collecting BIS data, and use of different versions of BIS software and hardware. Outcomes data are lacking. The 2002 Society of Critical Care Medicine Sedation Guidelines recommendation that more data are needed before the BIS should be used routinely in the ICU remains unchanged. We recommend that further studies be conducted to determine the optimal method of obtaining BIS data and evaluate the impact of the BIS on relevant patient outcomes.
回顾和评判在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中使用脑电双频指数(BIS)的证据。
对MEDLINE(1966年 - 2005年7月)、国际药学文摘(1971年 - 2005年7月)和科学引文索引扩展版(1980年 - 2005年7月)中的英文文章进行计算机检索。还使用关键词BIS、镇静和重症监护进行了摘要的手工检索。
纳入评估ICU患者BIS的病例系列、信函、社论和临床研究。
对19项比较BIS与镇静量表的研究进行评估,结果显示随着镇静程度增加BIS呈下降趋势。当镇静评分分组而非采用个体值时,BIS的相关性似乎更好。然而,在大多数研究中BIS与主观量表之间的相关性较低(r²为0.21 - 0.93)。此外,药物剂量与BIS之间的相关性较差。尚未有报告显示通过BIS监测能改善结局的随机对照试验。
由于人群异质性、收集BIS数据的不同方法以及使用不同版本的BIS软件和硬件等原因,解读关于BIS在ICU中作用的文献存在困难。缺乏结局数据。2002年危重病医学学会镇静指南关于在有更多数据之前不应在ICU常规使用BIS的建议仍然不变。我们建议进行进一步研究以确定获取BIS数据的最佳方法,并评估BIS对相关患者结局的影响。