Mahmood Saeed, Parchani Ashok, El-Menyar Ayman, Zarour Ahmad, Al-Thani Hassan, Latifi Rifat
Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Department of Clinical Research, Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar ; Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical School, Doha, Qatar.
Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Sep 26;5:141. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.141890. eCollection 2014.
Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in multiple trauma patients has become a common practice in monitoring the sedation levels. We aimed to assess the utility of BIS in the trauma intensive care unit (ICU).
A prospective observational study was conducted in the trauma ICU at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar between 2011 and 2012. Patients were divided in two groups: Group I (without BIS monitoring) and Group II (with BIS monitoring). The depth of sedation was clinically evaluated with Ramsey Sedation Scale, changes in vital signs and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) level. Use of sedatives, analgesics, and muscle relaxants were also recorded. Data were compared using Chi-square and Student t-tests.
A total of 110 mechanically ventilated trauma patients were enrolled with a mean age of 36 ± 14 years. The rate of head injury was greater in Group I when compared with Group II (94% vs. 81%, P = 0.04). In comparison to Group I, patients in Group II had lower GCS and higher mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) (6.3 ± 2.5 vs. 7.4 ± 2.7 and 25.5 ± 8.5 vs. 21.2 ± 4.7, respectively, P = 0.03). The used midazolam dose was less in Group II in comparison to Group I (5.2 ± 2.3 vs. 6.1 ± 2.1, P = 0.03). Also, fentanyl dose was less in Group II (152 ± 58 vs. 187 ± 59, P = 0.004). The rate of agitation, failure of extubation and tracheostomy in Group II were lower than those in Group I, P = 0.001. The length of stay for patients Group I was longer (14.6 ± 7.1 vs. 10.2 ± 5.9 days) in comparison to group II, P = 0.001.
Management of multiple trauma patients in the trauma ICU with BIS monitoring was found to be associated with better outcomes. BIS monitoring is a guide for adjusting the dosage of sedative agents. It can also minimize agitation, failure of extubation, and length of stay in ICU.
在多发伤患者中使用脑电双频指数(BIS)监测来评估镇静水平已成为一种常见做法。我们旨在评估BIS在创伤重症监护病房(ICU)中的作用。
2011年至2012年期间,在卡塔尔哈马德总医院的创伤ICU进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。患者分为两组:第一组(不进行BIS监测)和第二组(进行BIS监测)。通过拉姆齐镇静评分、生命体征变化和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)水平对镇静深度进行临床评估。还记录了镇静剂、镇痛药和肌肉松弛剂的使用情况。使用卡方检验和学生t检验对数据进行比较。
共纳入110例机械通气的创伤患者,平均年龄为36±14岁。与第二组相比,第一组的头部受伤率更高(94%对81%,P = 0.04)。与第一组相比,第二组患者的GCS更低,平均损伤严重程度评分(ISS)更高(分别为6.3±2.5对7.4±2.7和25.5±8.5对21.2±4.7,P = 0.03)。与第一组相比,第二组使用的咪达唑仑剂量更少(5.2±2.3对6.1±2.1,P = 0.03)。此外,第二组的芬太尼剂量也更少(152±58对187±59,P = 0.004)。第二组的躁动、拔管失败和气管切开率低于第一组,P = 0.001。与第二组相比,第一组患者的住院时间更长(14.6±7.1对10.2±5.9天),P = 0.001。
发现在创伤ICU中对多发伤患者进行BIS监测管理可带来更好的结果。BIS监测是调整镇静剂剂量的指导。它还可以将躁动、拔管失败和ICU住院时间降至最低。