• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塑造外科手术的未来:私人监管在确定质量标准中的作用。

Shaping the future of surgery: the role of private regulation in determining quality standards.

作者信息

Callcut Rachael A, Breslin Tara M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):304-12. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000200854.34298.e3.

DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000200854.34298.e3
PMID:16495692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1448933/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To educate surgeons about the growth of the private regulatory movement and its potential implications for the practice of surgery.

METHODS

An in-depth analysis and literature review of one of the largest private regulatory groups, the Leapfrog Group, provides a model for understanding the impact of these groups on the practice of surgery. A detailed discussion of the history, mission, structure, and quality initiatives of Leapfrog is included.

RESULTS

Private regulatory groups are using quality standards as a method for controlling the rising cost of health care. Traditionally, little financial support, manpower, or incentives have existed for individual surgeons and hospitals to report and maintain their own outcomes data. However, as surgical outcomes have increasingly become the target of quality improvement initiatives, the need to measure performance is gaining importance. Surgical quality has been both a direct target of private regulation, as illustrated by the evidence-based hospital referral guidelines of Leapfrog, and an indirect target with initiatives like computerized physician order entry and ICU staffing guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Private regulation is rapidly reshaping the way we practice and teach surgery. It is almost a certainty that their power, popularity, financial support, and missions will all continue to expand. As surgeons, we must decide soon if we wish to be an active participant in shaping the movement or, rather, if we are going to let it shape us by remaining largely uninvolved.

摘要

目的

让外科医生了解私营监管运动的发展及其对外科手术实践的潜在影响。

方法

对最大的私营监管组织之一“跨越组织”进行深入分析和文献综述,为理解这些组织对外科手术实践的影响提供了一个模型。其中包括对“跨越组织”的历史、使命、结构和质量倡议的详细讨论。

结果

私营监管组织将质量标准作为控制医疗保健成本上升的一种方法。传统上,对于个体外科医生和医院来说,几乎没有财政支持、人力或激励措施来报告和维护他们自己的结果数据。然而,随着手术结果越来越成为质量改进倡议的目标,衡量绩效的需求变得越来越重要。手术质量既是私营监管的直接目标,如“跨越组织”基于证据的医院转诊指南所示,也是计算机化医嘱录入和重症监护病房人员配备指南等倡议的间接目标。

结论

私营监管正在迅速重塑我们实施外科手术和教授外科手术的方式。几乎可以肯定的是,它们的权力、知名度、财政支持和使命都将继续扩大。作为外科医生,我们必须尽快决定是希望积极参与塑造这一运动,还是宁愿在很大程度上不参与,任由它塑造我们。

相似文献

1
Shaping the future of surgery: the role of private regulation in determining quality standards.塑造外科手术的未来:私人监管在确定质量标准中的作用。
Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):304-12. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000200854.34298.e3.
2
The Leapfrog Initiative: a potential threat to surgical education.“跳蛙”倡议:对外科教育的潜在威胁。
Curr Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;60(2):218-21. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7944(02)00684-0.
3
Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.新的“跳蛙”标准的潜在益处:过程与结果指标的影响
Surgery. 2004 Jun;135(6):569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.03.004.
4
Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.胰腺切除术中医院手术量、系统临床资源与死亡率之间的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Apr;208(4):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.019.
5
Training in the private sector: what works and how do we increase opportunities?私营部门的培训:哪些方法有效以及我们如何增加机会?
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Mar;79(3):138-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04830.x.
6
Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience.美国普通外科住院医师培训项目中的手术经验:期望与实际经验之间的差距。
Ann Surg. 2009 May;249(5):719-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a38e59.
7
Leapfrog patient-safety standards are a stretch for most hospitals.对大多数医院来说,“跳蛙”患者安全标准颇具挑战性。
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2004 Feb(77):1-6.
8
Contemporary performance of U.S. teaching and nonteaching hospitals.美国教学医院和非教学医院的当代表现。
Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):701-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253676a.
9
A study of the role of private patients in surgical training programs: a resident's viewpoint.关于私立患者在外科培训项目中作用的研究:住院医师的观点。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1980 May;56(4):385-92.
10
Reduction of in-hospital mortality among California hospitals meeting Leapfrog evidence-based standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.加利福尼亚州符合腹主动脉瘤修复循证标准的医院,其院内死亡率降低。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1155-6; discussion 1163-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Textbook outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a Delphi study to establish consensus.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的教科书结局:一项建立共识的德尔菲研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Feb;197(3):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06820-z. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
2
Is it time to measure complications from the National Trauma Data Bank? A longitudinal analysis of recent reporting trends.是否到了从国家创伤数据库(National Trauma Data Bank)衡量并发症的时候了?近期报告趋势的纵向分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Feb;86(2):282-288. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002133.
3
Association between hospital-reported Leapfrog Safe Practices Scores and inpatient mortality.医院报告的“跳蛙”安全实践评分与住院患者死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1341-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.422.
4
Outcomes of esophagectomy according to surgeon's training: general vs. thoracic.根据外科医生培训情况进行食管切除术的结果:普通外科医生与胸外科医生的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov;12(11):1907-11. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0664-y. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.计算机化医师医嘱录入系统在促成用药错误方面的作用。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1197-203. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1197.
2
Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?美国国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心手术效果更好吗?
Cancer. 2005 Feb 1;103(3):435-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20785.
3
Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals.克服美国医院采用和实施计算机化医师医嘱录入系统的障碍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):184-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.184.
4
Trends in general surgery workforce data.普通外科劳动力数据趋势。
Am J Surg. 2004 Jul;188(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.054.
5
Computerized physician order entry of diagnostic tests in an intensive care unit is associated with improved timeliness of service.重症监护病房中诊断检查的计算机化医嘱录入与服务及时性的提高相关。
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jun;32(6):1306-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000127783.47103.8d.
6
Intensive care unit physician staffing: financial modeling of the Leapfrog standard.重症监护病房医生配备:“跨越”标准的财务模型
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jun;32(6):1247-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000128609.98470.8b.
7
Invited commentary: Measurement of quality in surgery: that's our job.特邀评论:外科手术质量的衡量:这是我们的职责。
Surgery. 2004 Jun;135(6):576-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.05.001.
8
Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures.新的“跳蛙”标准的潜在益处:过程与结果指标的影响
Surgery. 2004 Jun;135(6):569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.03.004.
9
The surgical workforce crisis: rising to the challenge of caring for an aging America.外科劳动力危机:应对照顾老龄化美国的挑战
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Mar;113(3):893-902; discussion 903-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000105341.73322.e6.
10
Early and mid-term outcomes of surgery of the ascending aorta/arch: is there a relationship with caseload?升主动脉/主动脉弓手术的早期和中期结果:与病例数量有关吗?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 May;25(5):676-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.011.