Suppr超能文献

空腹血浆氨和胆汁酸浓度对犬门体分流的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of fasting plasma ammonia and bile acid concentrations in the identification of portosystemic shunting in dogs.

作者信息

Gerritzen-Bruning M J, van den Ingh T S G A M, Rothuizen J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Vet Intern Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;20(1):13-9. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[13:dvofpa]2.0.co;2.

Abstract

Portosystemic shunting occurs frequently either as congenital anomalies of the portal vein (PVA) or as acquired shunting (AS) due to portal hypertension secondary to parenchymal liver disease or portal vein thrombosis. The 2 most commonly used screening tests for portosystemic shunting are bile acid and plasma ammonia concentrations. The purpose of this study was to compare the 12-hour fasting plasma ammonia (AMM) and bile acid concentration (BA) as tests for diagnosing portosystemic shunting. Medical records of 337 dogs were used in which AMM and BA were measured simultaneously and in which portosystemic shunting was confirmed or excluded. These dogs were divided into 2 groups (group 1: portosystemic shunting present, n = 153, and group 2: portosystemic shunting absent, n = 184). Group 1 was subdivided into 2 subgroups (group 1a: PVA, n = 132 and group 1b: AS, n = 21). The sensitivity of AMM in detecting PVA was 100% and of BA was 92.2%. For portosystemic shunting in general (PVA or AS), the sensitivity of AMM was 98% and that of BA was 88.9%. The specificity in the total population of AMM was 89.1% and that of BA was 67.9%. If only dogs with liver diseases were included with (n = 153) or without (n = 28) shunting, the specificity of AMM to detect shunting was 89.3% and that of BA was 17.9%. In conclusion, AMM is a highly sensitive and specific parameter to detect PVA and portosystemic shunting in a general population and in dogs with liver disease, whereas BA is somewhat less sensitive and considerably less specific.

摘要

门体分流常作为门静脉先天性异常(PVA)出现,或因实质性肝病或门静脉血栓形成继发门静脉高压导致的获得性分流(AS)。门体分流最常用的两项筛查检测是胆汁酸和血浆氨浓度。本研究的目的是比较12小时禁食血浆氨(AMM)和胆汁酸浓度(BA)作为诊断门体分流的检测方法。使用了337只犬的病历,其中同时测量了AMM和BA,并确认或排除了门体分流。这些犬被分为两组(第1组:存在门体分流,n = 153;第2组:不存在门体分流,n = 184)。第1组又细分为两个亚组(第1a组:PVA,n = 132;第1b组:AS,n = 21)。AMM检测PVA的敏感性为100%,BA为92.2%。对于一般的门体分流(PVA或AS),AMM的敏感性为98%,BA为88.9%。AMM在总体人群中的特异性为89.1%,BA为67.9%。如果仅纳入有(n = 153)或无(n = 28)分流的肝病犬,AMM检测分流的特异性为89.3%,BA为17.9%。总之,AMM是检测一般人群和肝病犬中PVA和门体分流的高度敏感和特异的参数,而BA的敏感性稍低且特异性明显较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验