Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clinical Pathology and Clinical Pathophysiology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2021 Jan;33(1):35-46. doi: 10.1177/1040638720968784. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
Point-of-care analyzers (POCAs) for quantitative assessment of bile acids (BAs) are scarce in veterinary medicine. We evaluated the Fuji Dri-Chem Immuno AU10V analyzer and v-BA test kit (Fujifilm) for detection of feline and canine total serum BA concentration. Results were compared with a 5th-generation assay as reference method and a 3rd-generation assay, both run on a bench-top analyzer. Analytical performance was assessed at 3 different concentration ranges, and with interferences. For method comparison, samples of 60 healthy and diseased cats and 64 dogs were included. Linearity was demonstrated for a BA concentration up to 130 µmol/L in cats ( = 0.99) and 110 µmol/L in dogs ( = 0.99). The analyzer showed high precision near the lower limit of quantification of 2 µmol/L reported by the manufacturer. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were < 5% for both species and all concentrations. Interferences were observed for bilirubin (800 mg/L) and lipid (4 g/L). There was excellent correlation with the reference method for feline ( = 0.98) and canine samples ( = 0.97), with proportional biases of 6.7% and -1.3%, respectively. However, a large bias (44.1%) was noted when the POCA was compared to the 3rd-generation assay. Total observed error was less than total allowable error at the 3 concentrations. The POCA reliably detected feline and canine BA in clinically relevant concentrations.
在兽医领域,用于定量评估胆汁酸 (BAs) 的即时检验分析仪 (POCA) 较为稀缺。我们评估了 Fuji Dri-Chem Immuno AU10V 分析仪和 v-BA 检测试剂盒 (富士胶片) 用于检测猫和犬总血清 BA 浓度的性能。结果与第五代检测方法(参考方法)和第三代检测方法(在台式分析仪上运行)进行了比较。我们在 3 个不同的浓度范围内评估了分析性能,并评估了干扰情况。在方法比较中,纳入了 60 只健康和患病猫以及 64 只狗的样本。在猫中,BA 浓度高达 130 μmol/L(r = 0.99)和在犬中高达 110 μmol/L(r = 0.99)时,均表现出线性。该分析仪在制造商报告的定量下限 2 μmol/L 附近显示出较高的精密度。两种物种和所有浓度的批内和批间变异系数均 < 5%。对于胆红素(800 mg/L)和脂质(4 g/L)观察到干扰。与参考方法相比,猫(r = 0.98)和犬样本(r = 0.97)的相关性良好,分别存在 6.7%和-1.3%的比例偏差。然而,当与第三代检测方法进行比较时,POCA 出现了较大的偏差(44.1%)。在 3 个浓度下,总观察误差小于总允许误差。POCA 能够可靠地检测临床相关浓度的猫和犬 BA。