Johnson Patricia, St John Winsome, Moyle Wendy
Faculty of Nursing and Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Mar;53(5):551-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03757.x.
This paper reports a study to describe and interpret the meaning of being on long-term mechanical ventilation.
Patients who require mechanical ventilation in a critical care unit for prolonged periods of time are typically sicker than those who are ventilated for shorter periods. Despite advances in treatment modalities for critically ill patients, many still require long-term mechanical ventilation for 7 days or more. Therefore, caring for a long-term ventilated patient is often an everyday occurrence for critical care nurses; however, there is insufficient evidence of the meaning of this experience from a patient perspective.
We used an ontological phenomenological approach informed by the ideas of Heidegger. Data were collected using unstructured audio-taped interviews with nine former patients from critical care units unit in Queensland, Australia. The data were collected between January 2000 and December 2001 and analysed thematically using the method developed by van Manen.
Thematic analysis revealed four themes. This paper presents the findings from the theme titled 'existing in an uneveryday world', which revealed what it meant for participants to exist, live through and survive the many physiological and psychological effects arising from their critical illness episode. For the most part, this was an unpleasant and frightening experience that involved bizarre nightmares and inability to distinguish time, place and the familiar body; disagreeable effects from the technology used and patient care activities; and reliance on external agents for survival. In addition, participants reported how they questioned their chances of surviving the critical illness ordeal.
There is a need for further research in the areas of sedative and analgesic management in critically ill patients, methods of communicating with intubated and mechanically ventilated patients, and debriefing and follow-up support services for survivors.
本文报告一项旨在描述和阐释长期接受机械通气意义的研究。
在重症监护病房需要长时间接受机械通气的患者通常比短期接受通气的患者病情更重。尽管危重症患者的治疗方式有所进步,但许多患者仍需长期机械通气7天或更长时间。因此,护理长期接受通气的患者对重症监护护士来说是日常工作;然而,从患者角度来看,关于这种经历的意义,证据并不充分。
我们采用了受海德格尔思想启发的本体论现象学方法。通过对澳大利亚昆士兰州重症监护病房的9名 former patients 进行非结构化录音访谈来收集数据。数据收集于2000年1月至2001年12月期间,并使用范曼恩开发的方法进行主题分析。
主题分析揭示了四个主题。本文呈现了名为“存在于非日常世界”这一主题的研究结果,该主题揭示了参与者在经历严重疾病发作所产生的诸多生理和心理影响下生存、度过难关意味着什么。在很大程度上,这是一段不愉快且令人恐惧的经历,包括离奇的噩梦以及无法辨别时间、地点和熟悉的身体;所用技术和患者护理活动带来的不良影响;以及为了生存而依赖外部因素。此外,参与者报告了他们如何质疑自己在严重疾病折磨中存活的几率。
在危重症患者的镇静和镇痛管理、与插管及机械通气患者的沟通方法,以及为幸存者提供汇报和后续支持服务等领域,有必要开展进一步研究。