Jasiewicz Jan M, Allum John H J, Middleton James W, Barriskill Andrew, Condie Peter, Purcell Brendan, Li Raymond Che Tin
School of Human Movement Studies, Centre for Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.
Gait Posture. 2006 Dec;24(4):502-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.017. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
We report on three different methods of gait event detection (toe-off and heel strike) using miniature linear accelerometers and angular velocity transducers in comparison to using standard pressure-sensitive foot switches. Detection was performed with normal and spinal-cord injured subjects. The detection of end contact (EC), normally toe-off, and initial contact (IC) normally, heel strike was based on either foot linear accelerations or foot sagittal angular velocity or shank sagittal angular velocity. The results showed that all three methods were as accurate as foot switches in estimating times of IC and EC for normal gait patterns. In spinal-cord injured subjects, shank angular velocity was significantly less accurate (p<0.02). We conclude that detection based on foot linear accelerations or foot angular velocity can correctly identify the timing of IC and EC events in both normal and spinal-cord injured subjects.
我们报告了三种不同的步态事件检测方法(蹬离和足跟触地),该方法使用微型线性加速度计和角速度传感器,并与使用标准压敏脚踏开关的方法进行了比较。对正常受试者和脊髓损伤受试者进行了检测。终点接触(EC,通常为蹬离)和初始接触(IC,通常为足跟触地)的检测基于足部线性加速度、足部矢状角速度或小腿矢状角速度。结果表明,在估计正常步态模式的IC和EC时间时,这三种方法与脚踏开关一样准确。在脊髓损伤受试者中,小腿角速度的准确性明显较低(p<0.02)。我们得出结论,基于足部线性加速度或足部角速度的检测可以正确识别正常受试者和脊髓损伤受试者中IC和EC事件的时间。