Validation of gait analysis using smartphones: Reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to validate the reliability and validity of gait analysis using smartphones in a controlled environment.

METHODS

Thirty healthy adults attached smartphones to the waist and thigh, while an inertial measurement unit was fixed at the shank as a reference device; each participant was asked to walk six gait cycles at self-selected low, normal, and high speeds. Thirty-five cerebral small vessel disease patients were recruited to attach the smartphone to the thigh, performing single-task (ST), cognitive dual-task (DT), and physical dual-task walking (DT) to obtain gait parameters.

RESULTS

The results from the healthy group indicate that, regardless of whether attached to the thigh or waist, the smartphones calculated gait parameters with good reliability (ICC > 0.75) across three different walking speeds. There were no significant differences in the gait parameters between the smartphone attached to the thigh and the IMU across all three walking speeds (> 0.05). However, significant differences were observed between the smartphone at the waist and the IMU during the stance phase, swing phase, stance time, and stride length at high speeds (< 0.05). At the same time, measurements of other gait parameters were similar > 0.05). Patients demonstrated significant differences in the cadence, stride time, stance phase, swing phase, stance time, stride length, and walking speed between ST and DT (< 0.05). Significant differences were observed in the stance phase, swing phase, stride length, and walking speed between ST and DT (< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of using built-in smartphone sensors for gait analysis in a controlled environment.