Rosen Jules, Mittal Vikas, Degenholtz Howard, Castle Nick, Mulsant Benoit H, Hulland Shelley, Nace David, Rubin Fred
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15241, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Mar;7(3):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
Quality improvement (QI) processes in nursing homes are highly variable and often ineffective. This study evaluated an innovative QI process to reduce pressure ulcers (PUs) in a nursing home with a high rate of PUs.
This was a 48-week, longitudinal study comparing the incidence of PUs during 12-week baseline and intervention and post-intervention periods.
Not-for-profit, 136-bed nursing home in urban Western Pennsylvania.
All residents and all staff at the nursing home participated in this study.
The intervention consisted of 3 components: Ability enhancement, incentivization, and management feedback. To enhance ability, all staff members completed a computer-based interactive video education program on PU prevention and were mandated to use penlights to promote early detection. Incentivization included $75 for each staff member if the desired reduction in PU incidence was achieved. Management feedback provided real-time information of staff"s adherence to the mandated training.
Outcome measures consisted of staff's adherence to mandated training and the incidence of new PUs during the baseline period compared to the intervention and post-intervention periods.
Management responded to noncompliance with training with both rewards and stepped discipline. Adherence to protocol, as measured by training compliance, was 100%. There was a significant reduction (P < .05) in the incidence of stage 2 or worse PUs during the intervention period. During the post-intervention periods, the effect was lost.
An innovative QI initiative resulted in a significant decrease in PUs in 1 facility. This intervention was not sustainable when the 3 components of the QI intervention were no longer actively maintained.
疗养院的质量改进(QI)流程差异很大,且往往效果不佳。本研究评估了一种创新的QI流程,以降低一所压疮(PU)发生率较高的疗养院中的压疮发生率。
这是一项为期48周的纵向研究,比较了12周基线期、干预期和干预后期的PU发生率。
宾夕法尼亚州西部城市的一家非营利性、拥有136张床位的疗养院。
疗养院的所有居民和所有工作人员都参与了本研究。
干预包括三个组成部分:能力提升、激励和管理反馈。为提升能力,所有工作人员都完成了一个关于PU预防的基于计算机的交互式视频教育项目,并被要求使用笔形电筒以促进早期发现。激励措施包括,如果实现了预期的PU发生率降低,给每位工作人员75美元。管理反馈提供了工作人员遵守规定培训情况的实时信息。
结局指标包括工作人员对规定培训的遵守情况,以及与干预期和干预后期相比,基线期新发生PU的发生率。
管理层对未遵守培训的情况采取了奖励和逐步惩戒措施。以培训合规性衡量的对方案的遵守率为100%。在干预期,2期或更严重PU的发生率显著降低(P < .05)。在干预后期,这种效果消失了。
一项创新的QI举措使1家机构的PU显著减少。当QI干预的三个组成部分不再积极维持时,这种干预措施无法持续。