Suppr超能文献

区分细胞分裂周期中的线性和指数细胞生长:单细胞研究、细胞培养研究以及细胞周期研究的对象

Distinguishing between linear and exponential cell growth during the division cycle: single-cell studies, cell-culture studies, and the object of cell-cycle research.

作者信息

Cooper Stephen

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0620, USA.

出版信息

Theor Biol Med Model. 2006 Feb 23;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-3-10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two approaches to understanding growth during the cell cycle are single-cell studies, where growth during the cell cycle of a single cell is measured, and cell-culture studies, where growth during the cell cycle of a large number of cells as an aggregate is analyzed. Mitchison has proposed that single-cell studies, because they show variations in cell growth patterns, are more suitable for understanding cell growth during the cell cycle, and should be preferred over culture studies. Specifically, Mitchison argues that one can glean the cellular growth pattern by microscopically observing single cells during the division cycle. In contrast to Mitchison's viewpoint, it is argued here that the biological laws underlying cell growth are not to be found in single-cell studies. The cellular growth law can and should be understood by studying cells as an aggregate.

RESULTS

The purpose or objective of cell cycle analysis is presented and discussed. These ideas are applied to the controversy between proponents of linear growth as a possible growth pattern during the cell cycle and the proponents of exponential growth during the cell cycle. Differential (pulse) and integral (single cell) experiments are compared with regard to cell cycle analysis and it is concluded that pulse-labeling approaches are preferred over microscopic examination of cell growth for distinguishing between linear and exponential growth patterns. Even more to the point, aggregate experiments are to be preferred to single-cell studies.

CONCLUSION

The logical consistency of exponential growth--integrating and accounting for biochemistry, cell biology, and rigorous experimental analysis--leads to the conclusion that proposals of linear growth are the result of experimental perturbations and measurement limitations. It is proposed that the universal pattern of cell growth during the cell cycle is exponential.

摘要

背景

理解细胞周期中生长的两种方法是单细胞研究,即测量单个细胞在细胞周期中的生长情况,以及细胞培养研究,即分析大量细胞作为一个整体在细胞周期中的生长情况。米奇森提出,单细胞研究由于显示出细胞生长模式的变化,更适合理解细胞周期中的细胞生长,应优先于培养研究。具体而言,米奇森认为,通过在分裂周期中显微镜观察单个细胞,可以收集到细胞生长模式。与米奇森的观点相反,本文认为细胞生长的生物学规律并非存在于单细胞研究中。细胞生长规律能够且应该通过将细胞作为一个整体来研究而得以理解。

结果

提出并讨论了细胞周期分析的目的。这些观点被应用于细胞周期中线性生长作为一种可能的生长模式的支持者与指数生长的支持者之间的争论。就细胞周期分析而言,对差异(脉冲)实验和积分(单细胞)实验进行了比较,得出结论:对于区分线性和指数生长模式,脉冲标记方法优于对细胞生长的显微镜检查。更重要的是,整体实验优于单细胞研究。

结论

指数生长的逻辑一致性——整合并解释了生物化学、细胞生物学和严格的实验分析——得出结论,线性生长的提议是实验干扰和测量限制的结果。本文提出,细胞周期中细胞生长的普遍模式是指数式的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe5b/1402260/3d83c24f88b1/1742-4682-3-10-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验