Suppr超能文献

慢性心力衰竭患者认知障碍的预后重要性:专科管理是否有作用?

Prognostic importance of cognitive impairment in chronic heart failure patients: does specialist management make a difference?

作者信息

McLennan Skye N, Pearson Sue A, Cameron Janette, Stewart Simon

机构信息

University of South Australia, Division of Health Science, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2006 Aug;8(5):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.11.013. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is common among chronic heart failure (CHF) patients.

AIMS

To determine the prognostic significance of cognitive impairment in patients participating in a randomized study of a CHF management program (CHF-MP).

METHODS

CHF patients were randomized to a CHF-MP (n=100) or usual care (n=100). Baseline cognition was assessed using the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE). Five-year all-cause mortality, and combined death-or-readmission, were compared on the basis of the presence (MMSE 19-26) or absence (MMSE >26) of cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

27 patients (13.5%) had cognitive impairment and, on an adjusted basis, were more likely to die (96.3% versus 68.2%. RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.39: P<0.001) and/or experience an unplanned hospitalization (100% versus 94%. RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.95: P=0.019). Cognitively impaired patients had a similar (non-significant) adjusted risk of death-or-readmission in both the CHF-MP (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.11: P=0.403) and in usual care (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.53: P=0.305). In the usual care cohort, cognitive impairment was associated with a greater (non-significant), adjusted risk of death (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.92: P=0.122). In the CHF-MP, adjusted risk of death was significantly higher for cognitively impaired patients (RR 2.33, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.92: P=0.027).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that "mild" cognitive impairment is of prognostic importance in CHF: even when a CHF-MP has been applied.

摘要

背景

认知障碍在慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者中很常见。

目的

确定参与CHF管理项目(CHF-MP)随机研究的患者中认知障碍的预后意义。

方法

将CHF患者随机分为CHF-MP组(n = 100)或常规治疗组(n = 100)。使用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评估基线认知。根据是否存在认知障碍(MMSE 19 - 26)或无认知障碍(MMSE>26)比较五年全因死亡率以及死亡或再入院的合并情况。

结果

27例患者(13.5%)存在认知障碍,经校正后,这些患者更有可能死亡(96.3%对68.2%,RR 2.19,95%CI 1.41至3.39:P<0.001)和/或经历非计划住院(100%对94%,RR 1.44,95%CI 1.06至1.95:P = 0.019)。认知障碍患者在CHF-MP组(RR 1.40,95%CI 0.63至3.11:P = 0.403)和常规治疗组(RR 1.38,95%CI 0.75至2.53:P = 0.305)中死亡或再入院的校正风险相似(无统计学意义)。在常规治疗队列中,认知障碍与更高的(无统计学意义)校正死亡风险相关(RR 1.61,95%CI 1.10至4.92:P = 0.122)。在CHF-MP组中,认知障碍患者的校正死亡风险显著更高(RR 2.33,95%CI 1.10至4.92:P = 0.027)。

结论

这些数据表明,即使应用了CHF-MP,“轻度”认知障碍在CHF中仍具有预后重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验