Mokhtari Amirhossein, Frey H Christopher
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908, USA.
Risk Anal. 2005 Dec;25(6):1511-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00679.x.
This article demonstrates application of sensitivity analysis to risk assessment models with two-dimensional probabilistic frameworks that distinguish between variability and uncertainty. A microbial food safety process risk (MFSPR) model is used as a test bed. The process of identifying key controllable inputs and key sources of uncertainty using sensitivity analysis is challenged by typical characteristics of MFSPR models such as nonlinearity, thresholds, interactions, and categorical inputs. Among many available sensitivity analysis methods, analysis of variance (ANOVA) is evaluated in comparison to commonly used methods based on correlation coefficients. In a two-dimensional risk model, the identification of key controllable inputs that can be prioritized with respect to risk management is confounded by uncertainty. However, as shown here, ANOVA provided robust insights regarding controllable inputs most likely to lead to effective risk reduction despite uncertainty. ANOVA appropriately selected the top six important inputs, while correlation-based methods provided misleading insights. Bootstrap simulation is used to quantify uncertainty in ranks of inputs due to sampling error. For the selected sample size, differences in F values of 60% or more were associated with clear differences in rank order between inputs. Sensitivity analysis results identified inputs related to the storage of ground beef servings at home as the most important. Risk management recommendations are suggested in the form of a consumer advisory for better handling and storage practices.
本文展示了敏感性分析在具有区分变异性和不确定性的二维概率框架的风险评估模型中的应用。以微生物食品安全过程风险(MFSPR)模型作为测试平台。使用敏感性分析来识别关键可控输入和不确定性关键来源的过程,受到MFSPR模型的典型特征(如非线性、阈值、相互作用和分类输入)的挑战。在众多可用的敏感性分析方法中,将方差分析(ANOVA)与基于相关系数的常用方法进行了比较评估。在二维风险模型中,关于风险管理可优先考虑的关键可控输入的识别因不确定性而混淆。然而,如此处所示,尽管存在不确定性,方差分析仍能提供关于最有可能有效降低风险的可控输入的有力见解。方差分析恰当地选择了最重要的六个输入,而基于相关系数的方法却提供了误导性的见解。使用自助模拟来量化由于抽样误差导致的输入排名中的不确定性。对于选定的样本量,F值差异60%或更多与输入之间排名顺序的明显差异相关。敏感性分析结果确定与家庭中碎牛肉份的储存相关的输入最为重要。以消费者咨询的形式提出风险管理建议,以促进更好的处理和储存做法。