Suppr超能文献

FOLFOXIRI(亚叶酸、5-氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂和伊立替康)与FOLFIRI(亚叶酸、5-氟尿嘧啶和伊立替康)作为转移性结直肠癌(MCC)一线治疗方案的比较:希腊肿瘤研究组(HORG)的一项多中心随机III期试验

FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): a multicentre randomised phase III trial from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG).

作者信息

Souglakos J, Androulakis N, Syrigos K, Polyzos A, Ziras N, Athanasiadis A, Kakolyris S, Tsousis S, Kouroussis Ch, Vamvakas L, Kalykaki A, Samonis G, Mavroudis D, Georgoulias V

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, PO Box 1352, Heraklion, Crete 71110, Greece.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2006 Mar 27;94(6):798-805. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603011.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOXIRI) vs irinotecan and 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). A total of 283 chemotherapy-naïve patients with MCC were enrolled (FOLFIRI arm: n=146; FOLFOXIRI arm: n=137). In the FOLFOXIRI arm, CPT-11 (150 mg m(-2)) was given on d1, L-OHP (65 mg m(-2)) on d2, LV (200 mg m(-2)) on days 2 and 3 and 5-FU (400 mg m(-2) as i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) as 22 h i.v. continuous infusion) on days 2 and 3. In the FOLFIRI arm, CPT-11 (180 mg m(-2)) was given on d1 whereas LV and 5-FU were administered in the same way as in the FOLFOXIRI regimen. Both regimens were administered every 2 weeks. There was no difference in terms of overall survival (median OS: 19.5 and 21.5 months, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.337), median time to disease progression (FOLFIRI: 6.9 and FOLFOXIRI: 8.4 months; P=0.17), response rates (33.6 and 43% for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.168). Patients treated with FOLFOXIRI had a significantly higher incidence of alopecia (P=0.0001), diarrhoea (P=0.0001) and neurosensory toxicity (P=0.001) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI. The present study failed to demonstrate any superiority of the FOLFOXIRI combination compared with the FOLFIRI regimen, although the observed median OS is one of the best ever reported in the literature.

摘要

比较奥沙利铂(L-OHP)联合伊立替康(CPT-11)、5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)和亚叶酸钙(LV)(FOLFOXIRI)与伊立替康和5-FU/LV(FOLFIRI)作为转移性结直肠癌(MCC)患者一线治疗的疗效和毒性。共纳入283例初治MCC患者(FOLFIRI组:n = 146;FOLFOXIRI组:n = 137)。在FOLFOXIRI组中,CPT-11(150 mg m(-2))于第1天给药,L-OHP(65 mg m(-2))于第2天给药,LV(200 mg m(-2))于第2天和第3天给药,5-FU(400 mg m(-2)静脉推注和600 mg m(-2) 22小时静脉持续输注)于第2天和第3天给药。在FOLFIRI组中,CPT-11(180 mg m(-2))于第1天给药,而LV和5-FU的给药方式与FOLFOXIRI方案相同。两种方案均每2周给药一次。总生存期(FOLFIRI组和FOLFOXIRI组的中位总生存期分别为19.5个月和21.5个月;P = 0.337)、疾病进展中位时间(FOLFIRI组:6.9个月,FOLFOXIRI组:8.4个月;P = 0.17)、缓解率(FOLFIRI组和FOLFOXIRI组分别为33.6%和43%;P = 0.168)方面无差异。与接受FOLFIRI治疗的患者相比,接受FOLFOXIRI治疗的患者脱发(P = 0.0001)、腹泻(P = 0.0001)和神经感觉毒性(P = 0.001)的发生率显著更高。本研究未能证明FOLFOXIRI联合方案相较于FOLFIRI方案有任何优势,尽管观察到的中位总生存期是文献中报道的最佳结果之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca47/2361370/79e8044b401d/94-6603011f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验