Baker Richard
Hugh Williamson Gait Analysis Service, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006 Mar 2;3:4. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-4.
Brand's four reasons for clinical tests and his analysis of the characteristics of valid biomechanical tests for use in orthopaedics are taken as a basis for determining what methodologies are required for gait analysis in a clinical rehabilitation context.
The state of the art of optical systems capable of measuring the positions of retro-reflective markers placed on the skin is sufficiently advanced that they are probably no longer a significant source of error in clinical gait analysis. Determining the anthropometry of the subject and compensating for soft tissue movement in relation to the under-lying bones are now the principal problems. Techniques for using functional tests to determine joint centres and axes of rotation are starting to be used successfully. Probably the last great challenge for optical systems is in using computational techniques to compensate for soft tissue measurements. In the long term future it is possible that direct imaging of bones and joints in three dimensions (using MRI or fluoroscopy) may replace marker based systems.
There is still not an accepted general theory of why we walk the way we do. In the absence of this, many explanations of walking address the mechanisms by which specific movements are achieved by particular muscles. A whole new methodology is developing to determine the functions of individual muscles. This needs further development and validation. A particular requirement is for subject specific models incorporating 3-dimensional imaging data of the musculo-skeletal anatomy with kinematic and kinetic data.
Clinical gait analysis is extremely limited if it does not allow clinicians to choose between alternative possible interventions or to predict outcomes. This can be achieved either by rigorously planned clinical trials or using theoretical models. The evidence base is generally poor partly because of the limited number of prospective clinical trials that have been completed and more such studies are essential. Very recent work has started to show the potential of using models of the mechanisms by which people with pathology walk in order to simulate different potential interventions. The development of these models offers considerable promise for new clinical applications of gait analysis.
布兰德提出的临床测试的四个理由以及他对骨科有效生物力学测试特征的分析,被用作确定临床康复背景下步态分析所需方法的基础。
能够测量置于皮肤上的反光标记位置的光学系统技术已经足够先进,以至于它们可能不再是临床步态分析中的一个重要误差来源。确定受试者的人体测量学参数以及补偿软组织相对于其下方骨骼的运动,现在是主要问题。利用功能测试来确定关节中心和旋转轴的技术已开始成功应用。光学系统可能面临的最后一个重大挑战是利用计算技术来补偿软组织测量。从长远来看,三维骨骼和关节的直接成像(使用磁共振成像或荧光透视)有可能取代基于标记的系统。
对于我们为何以特定方式行走,目前仍没有一个被广泛接受的通用理论。在此情况下,许多关于行走的解释都涉及特定肌肉实现特定运动的机制。一种全新的方法正在发展,用于确定单个肌肉的功能。这需要进一步发展和验证。特别需要的是结合肌肉骨骼解剖结构的三维成像数据以及运动学和动力学数据的个体特异性模型。
如果临床步态分析不能让临床医生在多种可能的干预措施之间进行选择或预测结果,那么它的作用将极为有限。这可以通过严格规划的临床试验或使用理论模型来实现。证据基础通常较为薄弱,部分原因是已完成的前瞻性临床试验数量有限,更多此类研究至关重要。最近的工作已开始显示利用病理患者行走机制模型来模拟不同潜在干预措施的潜力。这些模型的发展为步态分析的新临床应用带来了巨大希望。