• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生关于停止和撤销维持生命治疗的决定。

Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment.

作者信息

Farber Neil J, Simpson Pamela, Salam Tabassum, Collier Virginia U, Weiner Joan, Boyer E Gil

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Delaware 19899, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):560-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.560.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.166.5.560
PMID:16534044
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few data are available about physicians' decisions in regard to withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining measures. We therefore studied internists' views on this subject.

METHODS

We surveyed 1000 generalist and subspecialist internists about their views on withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Thirty-two hypothetical cases were included. The effect of the demographic data on withholding or withdrawing treatment was analyzed via analysis of covariance and multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 1000 internists, 407 (41%) completed and returned surveys. A majority of respondents (51%) were willing to withhold or withdraw treatment in all 32 scenarios; 49% were unwilling to withhold or withdraw in at least 1 scenario. Respondents were likely to withhold treatment in 14 of 16 scenarios compared with 13.7 of 16 scenarios for withdrawing treatments (P<.001). Respondents withheld or withdrew feeding tubes in 6.6 of 8 scenarios (P<.001) and antibiotics in 6.7 of 8 scenarios (P = .001) compared with ventilators (7.1 of 8 scenarios) and dialysis (7.3 of 8 scenarios). Respondents were less likely to withhold or withdraw treatments in nonterminally ill (12.9 of 16 scenarios) (P = .02) and alert patients (13.2 of 16 scenarios) (P<.001) compared with terminally ill patients (14.9 of 16 scenarios) and patients with dementia (14.5 of 16 scenarios).

CONCLUSIONS

A large percentage of internists would be unwilling to adhere to some of patients' wishes to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. The clinical scenario and type of treatment affect internists' decisions about whether they would withhold or withdraw such treatment.

摘要

背景

关于医生在放弃或撤销维持生命措施方面的决策,可用数据较少。因此,我们研究了内科医生对此问题的看法。

方法

我们就放弃或撤销维持生命治疗的看法,对1000名普通内科医生和专科内科医生进行了调查。纳入了32个假设病例。通过协方差分析和多元逻辑回归分析人口统计学数据对放弃或撤销治疗的影响。

结果

1000名内科医生中,407名(41%)完成并返回了调查问卷。大多数受访者(51%)愿意在所有32种情况下放弃或撤销治疗;49%的人在至少1种情况下不愿意放弃或撤销治疗。与16种情况中的13.7种相比,受访者在16种情况中的14种可能会放弃治疗(P<0.001)。与呼吸机(8种情况中的7.1种)和透析(8种情况中的7.3种)相比,受访者在8种情况中的6.6种会放弃或撤销喂食管(P<0.001),在八项情况中的6.7种会放弃抗生素(P = 0.001)。与晚期患者(16种情况中的14.9种)和痴呆患者(16种情况中的14.5种)相比,受访者在非晚期患者(16种情况中的12.9种)(P = 0.02)和清醒患者(16种情况中的13.2种)(P<0.001)中放弃或撤销治疗的可能性较小。

结论

很大一部分内科医生不愿意遵从患者放弃或撤销维持生命治疗的某些意愿。临床情况和治疗类型会影响内科医生关于是否放弃或撤销此类治疗的决策。

相似文献

1
Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment.医生关于停止和撤销维持生命治疗的决定。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):560-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.560.
2
Physicians' religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviors.医生的宗教信仰与临终关怀态度及行为。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2004 Oct;71(5):335-43.
3
Forgoing life-sustaining treatments: comparison of attitudes between Israeli and North American intensive care healthcare professionals.放弃维持生命的治疗:以色列与北美重症监护医疗专业人员态度之比较
Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Nov;5(11):770-4.
4
Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey.日本医生对临终患者维持生命治疗的 withhold 和 withdrawal 的态度及行为:一项网络调查结果 。 注:这里“withhold and withdrawal”在医学语境中可能有特定含义,比如“ withhold ”可能是“ withhold treatment ”( withhold 治疗,即不给予某种治疗措施 ) ,“ withdrawal ”可能是“ withdrawal of treatment ”( 撤除治疗 ) ,具体准确含义需结合医学专业知识进一步理解 ,但仅按要求翻译为上述内容 。
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Jun 19;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-7.
5
Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study.重症监护病房中撤除和停止生命支持:一项西班牙前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Nov;27(11):1744-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1111-7. Epub 2001 Oct 12.
6
Influence of malignancy on the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy in critically ill patients.恶性肿瘤对重症患者维持生命治疗的撤除或不予实施决策的影响。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;26(6):464-9. doi: 10.1177/1049909109341872. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
7
Japanese physicians' practice of withholding and withdrawing mechanical ventilation and artificial nutrition and hydration from older adults with very severe stroke.日本医生对患有非常严重中风的老年人停止和撤除机械通气以及人工营养和水分补给的做法。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008 May-Jun;46(3):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
8
[No conspicuous changes in the practice of medical end-of-life decision-making for neonates and infants in the Netherlands in 2001 as compared to 1995].与1995年相比,2001年荷兰新生儿和婴儿临终医疗决策实践中无明显变化。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Sep 10;149(37):2047-51.
9
Discrepancies among patients, family members, and physicians in Korea in terms of values regarding the withholding of treatment from patients with terminal malignancies.韩国患者、家庭成员和医生在对晚期恶性肿瘤患者停止治疗的价值观方面存在差异。
Cancer. 2004 May 1;100(9):1961-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20184.
10
[Providing or withholding treatment: the role of the patient's wish and priorities in palliative care].[提供或停止治疗:患者意愿及优先事项在姑息治疗中的作用]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002 Aug 16;127(33):1690-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33378.

引用本文的文献

1
Interprofessional Clinician Perspectives on LVAD Deactivation Compared to Dialysis Discontinuation: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Vignettes.与停止透析相比,跨专业临床医生对左心室辅助装置停用的看法:一项使用病例的横断面研究
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 1):101835. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101835. Epub 2025 May 30.
2
Effects of life-sustaining treatment plans on healthcare expenditure and healthcare utilization.维持生命治疗方案对医疗支出和医疗利用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):1236. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10235-x.
3
Facing Death: Attitudes toward Physician-Assisted End of Life among Physicians Working at a Tertiary-Care-Hospital in Israel.
面对死亡:以色列一家三级保健医院医生对医生协助终末期生命的态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 13;18(12):6396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126396.
4
Long-term prognosis of enteral feeding and parenteral nutrition in a population aged 75 years and older: a population-based cohort study.75 岁及以上人群肠内喂养和肠外营养的长期预后:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-02003-x.
5
US Physicians' Opinions about Distinctions between Withdrawing and Withholding Life-Sustaining Treatment.美国医生对撤除和 withholding 维持生命治疗之间区别的看法。 (注:“withholding”在这里直接保留英文,因为在医学语境中它有特定含义,暂未找到完全对应的简洁中文表述,直接用英文更准确传达原意)
J Relig Health. 2016 Oct;55(5):1596-606. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0171-x.
6
Capsule commentary on Thomas et al., A comparison of the willingness of resident and attending physicians to comply with the requests of patients at the end of life.关于托马斯等人的简要评论:住院医师和主治医生在临终时遵从患者请求意愿的比较
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29(7):1058. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2863-4.
7
A comparison of the willingness of resident and attending physicians to comply with the requests of patients at the end of life.住院医师和主治医生在临终时遵从患者请求意愿的比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29(7):1048-54. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2830-0. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
8
Variation in the use of renal replacement therapy in patients with septic shock: a substudy of the prospective multicenter observational FINNAKI study.感染性休克患者肾脏替代治疗使用情况的差异:前瞻性多中心观察性FINNAKI研究的一项子研究
Crit Care. 2014 Feb 5;18(1):R26. doi: 10.1186/cc13716.
9
Contrasting approaches to end of life and palliative care in end stage kidney disease.终末期肾病患者临终关怀与姑息治疗的不同方法
Indian J Nephrol. 2012 Jul;22(4):307-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-4065.101263.
10
Medical ethical knowledge and moral attitudes among physicians in Bavaria.巴伐利亚州医生的医学伦理知识和道德态度。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Feb;109(8):141-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0141. Epub 2012 Feb 24.