• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

I类复合树脂修复体在体内的术后敏感性

Postoperative sensitivity in Class I composite resin restorations in vivo.

作者信息

Casselli Denise Sá Maia, Martins Luis Roberto Marcondes

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Piracicaba, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2006 Feb;8(1):53-8.

PMID:16536346
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the postoperative sensitivity of posterior Class I composite resin restorations, restored with a self-etching or a total-etch one-bottle adhesive system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred four restorations were replaced by one clinician in 52 patients. Each patient received two restorations. After cavity preparations were completed under rubber-dam isolation, they were restored using Clearfil SE Bond or Single Bond and a resin-based restorative material (Filtek Z250). Sensitivity was evaluated at 0 and 7 days and 6 months using cold stimuli, and recorded using a visual analogue scale. If sensitivity was experienced on day 7, patients were also contacted on days 14 and 30 to assess the degree of sensitivity. The scores were analyzed as nonparametric data by means of the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in sensitivity were found between the two adhesives systems at days 0 and 7 or at 6 months. No spontaneous postoperative sensitivity was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The adhesives systems used in this study showed no differences in postoperative sensitivity, and did not show spontaneous sensitivity after 6 months.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了使用自酸蚀或全酸蚀单瓶粘结系统修复的Ⅰ类后牙复合树脂修复体的术后敏感性。

材料与方法

52例患者的104颗修复体由一名临床医生进行更换。每位患者接受两颗修复体。在橡皮障隔离下完成窝洞预备后,使用Clearfil SE Bond或Single Bond以及树脂基修复材料(Filtek Z250)进行修复。在0天、7天和6个月时使用冷刺激评估敏感性,并使用视觉模拟量表进行记录。如果在第7天出现敏感症状,还会在第14天和第30天联系患者以评估敏感程度。通过Friedman和Wilcoxon检验将分数作为非参数数据进行分析。

结果

在第0天、7天或6个月时,两种粘结系统之间的敏感性没有统计学上的显著差异。未报告有自发性术后敏感症状。

结论

本研究中使用的粘结系统在术后敏感性方面没有差异,并且在6个月后未表现出自发性敏感症状。

相似文献

1
Postoperative sensitivity in Class I composite resin restorations in vivo.I类复合树脂修复体在体内的术后敏感性
J Adhes Dent. 2006 Feb;8(1):53-8.
2
Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity.全酸蚀粘结剂与自酸蚀粘结剂:对术后敏感的影响
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1621-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109.
3
Effect of prerestorative home-bleaching on microleakage of self-etch adhesives.预备性家庭漂白对自酸蚀黏结剂微渗漏的影响。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Jun;22(3):186-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00335.x.
4
A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives.两种瓶装与一种瓶装牙本质黏结剂的三年临床评估
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Mar;136(3):311-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0171.
5
Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo.2类树脂复合材料体内修复体的边缘完整性和术后敏感性。
J Dent. 1998 Sep;26(7):555-62. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00042-0.
6
In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.采用两步酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀牙本质黏结系统对有和无衬层的后牙复合树脂微渗漏的体外比较。
Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.2341/10-215-L. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
7
Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde.采用含戊二醛的自酸蚀黏接剂对术后敏感性的临床评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;24(3):349-54. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000300015.
8
Does operatory field isolation influence the performance of direct adhesive restorations?手术区域隔离是否会影响直接粘接修复体的性能?
J Adhes Dent. 2013 Feb;15(1):27-32. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28194.
9
Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.一种硅氧烷基复合材料与一种甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料结合两种不同粘接方法的五年临床性能
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jun;20(5):991-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1591-4. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
10
Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer.一种新型树脂基修复材料和自酸蚀底漆术后敏感性的短期和长期临床评估
Oper Dent. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):543-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Resin cement selection for different types of fixed partial coverage restorations: A narrative systematic review.不同类型固定局部修复体用树脂水门汀的选择:叙述性系统评价。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Dec;9(6):1096-1111. doi: 10.1002/cre2.761. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.不同类型根管桩的粘结剂选择标准。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Jul 18;19:51. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Using Three Different Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials in Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A Split-Mouth Design In Vivo Study.
使用三种不同的牙齿颜色修复材料对非龋性颈部病变进行术后敏感性的比较评估:一项体内分口设计研究
Cureus. 2022 Aug 10;14(8):e27861. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27861. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial.乙醇湿粘结技术对Ⅱ类复合树脂修复术后牙本质敏感的影响:一项随机试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Nov 22;18:97. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.330878. eCollection 2021.
5
Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.后牙修复随机对照试验对CONSORT声明的依从性:方法学的系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):41-64. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04198-8. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
One-Year Clinical Performance of the Fast-Modelling Bulk Technique and Composite-Up Layering Technique in Class I Cavities.I类洞型中快速成型堆积技术和复合树脂分层堆塑技术的一年临床性能
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;13(11):1873. doi: 10.3390/polym13111873.
7
Effect of a Self-Etch Adhesive Containing Nanobioglass on Postoperative Sensitivity of Posterior Composite Restorations - A Randomized Trial.含纳米生物活性玻璃的自酸蚀粘结剂对后牙复合树脂修复术后敏感性的影响——一项随机试验
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jul 25;7(14):2313-2320. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.585. eCollection 2019 Jul 30.
8
Meta-analysis of the clinical behavior of posterior direct resin restorations: Low polymerization shrinkage resin in comparison to methacrylate composite resin.后牙直接树脂修复体临床行为的Meta分析:低聚合收缩树脂与甲基丙烯酸酯复合树脂的比较
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0191942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191942. eCollection 2018.
9
The effect of bonding and surface sealant application on postoperative sensitivity from posterior composites.粘结和表面封闭剂应用对后牙复合树脂修复术后敏感性的影响。
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2015 Oct 21;49(3):1-10. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.33921. eCollection 2015.
10
Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with nanohybrid, silorane, and fiber reinforced composite: An in vitro study.用纳米混合材料、硅烷和纤维增强复合材料修复的根管治疗牙齿的抗折性比较:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):364-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186458.