• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用含戊二醛的自酸蚀黏接剂对术后敏感性的临床评估。

Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;24(3):349-54. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000300015.

DOI:10.1590/s1806-83242010000300015
PMID:20877974
Abstract

The present clinical study aimed to assess the postoperative sensitivity (POS) after 48 hours and seven days in occlusal restorations bonded with three different adhesive systems, two of them containing glutaraldehyde. The restorative procedures were performed using the three-step etch-and-rinse Adper SBMP-Plus adhesive (SBMP), the two-step etch-and-rinse Gluma Comfort One Bond + Desensitizer adhesive (GC+D) and the all-in-one self-etching/priming I Bond (IB) adhesive, which also has glutaraldehyde in its formula. All cavities were restored with Filtek Supreme nanoparticle composite resin. After 48 hours and seven days the patients were recalled and the postoperative sensitivity evaluated. The data analyzed by non-parametric Friedman test showed no significant differences in POS among the three tested groups after 48 hours and seven days.

摘要

本临床研究旨在评估 48 小时和 7 天后使用三种不同粘接系统粘接的牙合面修复体的术后敏感(POS),其中两种含有戊二醛。修复程序使用三步酸蚀冲洗 Adper SBMP-Plus 粘接剂(SBMP)、两步酸蚀冲洗 Gluma Comfort One Bond + Desensitizer 粘接剂(GC+D)和自酸蚀/预处理一步法 I Bond(IB)粘接剂进行,后者的配方中也含有戊二醛。所有窝洞均用 Filtek Supreme 纳米复合树脂修复。48 小时和 7 天后,召回患者并评估术后敏感。非参数 Friedman 检验分析的数据显示,48 小时和 7 天后,三种测试组之间的 POS 无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity using self-etching adhesives containing glutaraldehyde.采用含戊二醛的自酸蚀黏接剂对术后敏感性的临床评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;24(3):349-54. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000300015.
2
Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.4种酸蚀冲洗粘结剂和3种自酸蚀粘结剂在进行热循环后,有或没有可流动复合树脂衬层时的微渗漏情况。
Oper Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):450-5. doi: 10.2341/05-55.
3
Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.应用戊二醛基脱敏剂后对后牙复合树脂修复体的术后敏感性:一项随机临床试验。
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103918. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103918. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
4
Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.一种硅氧烷基复合材料与一种甲基丙烯酸酯基复合材料结合两种不同粘接方法的五年临床性能
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jun;20(5):991-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1591-4. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.I类洞修复中不同修复树脂的三年临床评估
Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jun;39(3):248-55. doi: 10.2341/13-221-C.
6
Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.树脂改性玻璃离子体和复合树脂修复体的边缘微渗漏:使用酸蚀冲洗粘结剂和自酸蚀粘结剂的效果
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 May-Jun;23(3):378-83. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.102234.
7
Postoperative sensitivity in Class I composite resin restorations in vivo.I类复合树脂修复体在体内的术后敏感性
J Adhes Dent. 2006 Feb;8(1):53-8.
8
Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity.全酸蚀粘结剂与自酸蚀粘结剂:对术后敏感的影响
J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1621-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109.
9
Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial.不同通用型粘结剂在 NCCL 中酸蚀-冲洗、选择性酸蚀和自酸蚀应用模式下的 24 个月临床性能:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180358. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0358. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive.自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘结剂的术后敏感性
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Jun;24(6):383-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Study of Different Traditional and Bioactive Indirect Pulp Lining Materials on Post-Operative Dentin Hypersensitivity: An In Vivo Study.不同传统及生物活性间接盖髓材料对术后牙本质敏感影响的比较研究:一项体内研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 6;17(1):e76984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76984. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同黏接系统对复合树脂修复牙齿缺损及敏感性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2495-2511. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05007-0. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
Is dentin biomodification with collagen cross-linking agents effective for improving dentin adhesion? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
使用胶原交联剂对牙本质进行生物改性对改善牙本质黏附是否有效?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Restor Dent Endod. 2022 May 6;47(2):e23. doi: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e23. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.后牙修复随机对照试验对CONSORT声明的依从性:方法学的系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):41-64. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04198-8. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Effect of a Self-Etch Adhesive Containing Nanobioglass on Postoperative Sensitivity of Posterior Composite Restorations - A Randomized Trial.含纳米生物活性玻璃的自酸蚀粘结剂对后牙复合树脂修复术后敏感性的影响——一项随机试验
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jul 25;7(14):2313-2320. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.585. eCollection 2019 Jul 30.