Suppr超能文献

探索多元文化社区中糖尿病患者的研究重点:一项焦点小组研究。

Discovering the research priorities of people with diabetes in a multicultural community: a focus group study.

作者信息

Brown Ken, Dyas Jane, Chahal Prit, Khalil Yesmean, Riaz Perween, Cummings-Jones Joy

机构信息

Family Medical Centre, Nottingham.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Mar;56(524):206-13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Usually experts decide on which research is worthwhile, yet it is government policy to involve service users in research. There has been a lack of published research about involving patients from minority ethnic groups and people from deprived areas in setting research agendas. In this study we wanted to hear the voices of patients that are not often heard.

AIM

To find out the research priorities of people with diabetes from an inner city community and compare these with current expert-led research priorities in diabetes.

DESIGN OF STUDY

A qualitative study using a participatory approach with consumer groups.

SETTING

Primary care within inner city Nottingham, UK.

METHOD

Thirty-nine adult patients with diabetes with varying ethnic backgrounds recruited from three general practices. Six focus groups carried out in participants' preferred language, analysed using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

Nine main themes equating to research priorities were identified. Within these themes, information and awareness, service delivery and primary prevention of diabetes emerged as the main factors. There were no science-based topics and there was more emphasis on culturally influenced research questions, which differed from recent Department of Health priorities. There were several themes about service delivery, patient self-management and screening and prevention of diabetes that overlapped.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some divergence between expert-led and patient-led agendas in research about diabetes. Patient perspectives have a significant influence on research priorities, and there are likely to be several different patient perspectives.

摘要

背景

通常由专家决定哪些研究是有价值的,但让服务使用者参与研究是政府政策。关于让少数族裔患者和贫困地区人群参与制定研究议程的已发表研究一直较少。在本研究中,我们希望倾听那些不常被听到的患者的声音。

目的

了解来自市中心社区的糖尿病患者的研究重点,并将其与当前专家主导的糖尿病研究重点进行比较。

研究设计

采用参与式方法对消费者群体进行定性研究。

研究地点

英国诺丁汉市中心的初级保健机构。

方法

从三个普通诊所招募了39名具有不同种族背景的成年糖尿病患者。以参与者喜欢的语言进行了六个焦点小组讨论,并采用持续比较法进行分析。

结果

确定了等同于研究重点的九个主要主题。在这些主题中,信息与认知、服务提供以及糖尿病的一级预防成为主要因素。没有基于科学的主题,并且更强调受文化影响的研究问题,这与近期卫生部的重点不同。有几个关于服务提供、患者自我管理以及糖尿病筛查与预防的主题相互重叠。

结论

在糖尿病研究中,专家主导的议程和患者主导的议程之间存在一些差异。患者的观点对研究重点有重大影响,并且可能存在几种不同的患者观点。

相似文献

2
Involving users in service planning: a focus group approach.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Sep;10(4):283-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.12.008. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
3
Consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with diabetes in primary care: A qualitative study of patient views.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jan;48(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
5
Low-income American Indians' perceptions of diabetes.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 Sep-Oct;38(5):307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.04.004.
8
The identification of topics for research that are important to people with ulcerative colitis.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Sep;18(9):939-44. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000230088.91415.5b.

引用本文的文献

1
3
Identifying the Health Concerns of Pregnant British Pakistani Women Living in Deprived Areas: A Qualitative Study.
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Mar;28(3):489-495. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03797-z. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
5
Exploring the obesity concerns of British Pakistani women living in deprived inner-city areas: A qualitative study.
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1821-1831. doi: 10.1111/hex.13527. Epub 2022 May 14.
8
Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a focus group study.
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Jun 16;15(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00766-9.
10
How patient and community involvement in diabetes research influences health outcomes: A realist review.
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):907-920. doi: 10.1111/hex.12935. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Self report in clinical and epidemiological studies with non-English speakers: the challenge of language and culture.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jul;58(7):618-22. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.010074.
2
Self reports in research with non-English speakers.
BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):352-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.352.
3
Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.
Health Policy. 2002 Aug;61(2):213-36. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00214-7.
4
Consulting about consulting: challenges to effective consulting about public health research.
Health Expect. 2001 Dec;4(4):209-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00134.x.
5
Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer.
Lancet. 2000 Jun 10;355(9220):2037-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02351-5.
7
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.
BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299-302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验