Brown Ken, Dyas Jane, Chahal Prit, Khalil Yesmean, Riaz Perween, Cummings-Jones Joy
Family Medical Centre, Nottingham.
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Mar;56(524):206-13.
Usually experts decide on which research is worthwhile, yet it is government policy to involve service users in research. There has been a lack of published research about involving patients from minority ethnic groups and people from deprived areas in setting research agendas. In this study we wanted to hear the voices of patients that are not often heard.
To find out the research priorities of people with diabetes from an inner city community and compare these with current expert-led research priorities in diabetes.
A qualitative study using a participatory approach with consumer groups.
Primary care within inner city Nottingham, UK.
Thirty-nine adult patients with diabetes with varying ethnic backgrounds recruited from three general practices. Six focus groups carried out in participants' preferred language, analysed using the constant comparative method.
Nine main themes equating to research priorities were identified. Within these themes, information and awareness, service delivery and primary prevention of diabetes emerged as the main factors. There were no science-based topics and there was more emphasis on culturally influenced research questions, which differed from recent Department of Health priorities. There were several themes about service delivery, patient self-management and screening and prevention of diabetes that overlapped.
There is some divergence between expert-led and patient-led agendas in research about diabetes. Patient perspectives have a significant influence on research priorities, and there are likely to be several different patient perspectives.
通常由专家决定哪些研究是有价值的,但让服务使用者参与研究是政府政策。关于让少数族裔患者和贫困地区人群参与制定研究议程的已发表研究一直较少。在本研究中,我们希望倾听那些不常被听到的患者的声音。
了解来自市中心社区的糖尿病患者的研究重点,并将其与当前专家主导的糖尿病研究重点进行比较。
采用参与式方法对消费者群体进行定性研究。
英国诺丁汉市中心的初级保健机构。
从三个普通诊所招募了39名具有不同种族背景的成年糖尿病患者。以参与者喜欢的语言进行了六个焦点小组讨论,并采用持续比较法进行分析。
确定了等同于研究重点的九个主要主题。在这些主题中,信息与认知、服务提供以及糖尿病的一级预防成为主要因素。没有基于科学的主题,并且更强调受文化影响的研究问题,这与近期卫生部的重点不同。有几个关于服务提供、患者自我管理以及糖尿病筛查与预防的主题相互重叠。
在糖尿病研究中,专家主导的议程和患者主导的议程之间存在一些差异。患者的观点对研究重点有重大影响,并且可能存在几种不同的患者观点。