Dou Z L, Man D W K, Ou H N, Zheng J L, Tam S F
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, PR China.
Brain Inj. 2006 Mar;20(3):219-25. doi: 10.1080/02699050500488215.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a computerized, errorless learning-based memory rehabilitation program for Chinese patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
This study adopted a pre- and post-test quasi-experimental design. A total of 37 patients with TBI were randomly assigned to a Computer-Assisted Memory Training Group (CAMG), a Therapist-administered Memory Training Group (TAMG) and a Control Group (CG). Except for the CG, the patients in both the CAMG and TAMG groups received, respectively, 1-month memory training programmes that were similar in content but differed in delivery mode. All patients were followed up 1 month after treatment. The outcome measures that were taken were the Neurobehavioural Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE or Cognistat), the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT) and The Hong Kong List Learning Test (HKLLT). Repeated measure analyses were performed to investigate differences among the three groups.
The patients in the Computer-assisted Memory Rehabilitation (CAMG) and Therapist-administered Memory Rehabilitation group (TAMG) were found to perform better than the CG in the NCSE and RBMT, but no significant differences were found between the CAMG and TAMG. The CAMG showed significant improvement in their HKLLT assessment as compared with the TAMG and CG. No statistically significant differences were found between the CAMG and TAMG when comparing the post-training outcome measures with the follow-up results.
There is no difference between CAMG and TAMG, but the efficacy has been demonstrated when comparing with CG. It is suggested that the combined use of an errorless learning and a computerized approach may be an effective way of enhancing the memories of patients with TBI. This new method may smooth the progress of the whole human memory process and produce a better carryover treatment effect.
评估基于无错误学习的计算机化记忆康复程序对中国创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的有效性。
本研究采用前后测准实验设计。总共37名TBI患者被随机分配到计算机辅助记忆训练组(CAMG)、治疗师指导记忆训练组(TAMG)和对照组(CG)。除CG组外,CAMG组和TAMG组的患者分别接受了为期1个月的记忆训练计划,内容相似但交付方式不同。所有患者在治疗后1个月进行随访。采用的结果测量指标为神经行为认知状态检查(NCSE或认知状态量表)、里弗米德行为记忆测试(RBMT)和香港词汇学习测试(HKLLT)。进行重复测量分析以研究三组之间的差异。
发现计算机辅助记忆康复组(CAMG)和治疗师指导记忆康复组(TAMG)的患者在NCSE和RBMT中的表现优于CG组,但CAMG组和TAMG组之间未发现显著差异。与TAMG组和CG组相比,CAMG组在HKLLT评估中显示出显著改善。将训练后结果测量指标与随访结果进行比较时,CAMG组和TAMG组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。
CAMG组和TAMG组之间没有差异,但与CG组相比已证明其有效性。建议将无错误学习和计算机化方法结合使用可能是增强TBI患者记忆的有效方法。这种新方法可能会使整个人类记忆过程更加顺利,并产生更好的延续治疗效果。