Quintero-Gallego Eliana A, Gómez Carlos M, Vaquero Casares Encarnación, Márquez Javier, Pérez-Santamaría Fco Javier
Psychology Department, Neuropsychology Unity, Bosque University, Bogotá, Colombia.
Behav Brain Funct. 2006 Mar 15;2:9. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-2-9.
This quasi-experimental study was designed to assess two important learning types - procedural and declarative--in children and adolescents affected by posterior fossa tumours (astrocytoma vs. medulloblastoma), given that memory has an important impact on the child's academic achievement and personal development.
We had three groups: two clinical (eighteen subjects) and one control (twelve subjects). The learning types in these groups were assessed by two experimental tasks evaluating procedural-implicit and declarative memory. A Serial Reaction-Time Task was used to measure procedural sequence learning, and the Spanish version 1 of the California Verbal Learning Test-Children's Version- CVLT- 2 to measure declarative-explicit learning. The learning capacity was assessed considering only the blocks that represent learning, and were compared with MANOVA in clinical and normal subjects. The Raven, simple reaction-time, finger-tapping test, and grooved pegboard tests were used to assess the overall functioning of subjects. The results were compared with those from a control group of the same age, and with Spanish norm-referenced tools where available.
The results indicate the absence of procedural-implicit learning in both clinical groups, whereas declarative-explicit learning is maintained in both groups.
The clinical groups showed a conservation of declarative learning and a clear impairment of procedural learning. The results support the role of the cerebellum in the early phase of procedural learning.
鉴于记忆对儿童的学业成绩和个人发展具有重要影响,本准实验研究旨在评估受后颅窝肿瘤影响的儿童和青少年(星形细胞瘤与髓母细胞瘤)的两种重要学习类型——程序性学习和陈述性学习。
我们有三组:两个临床组(18名受试者)和一个对照组(12名受试者)。通过两项评估程序性内隐记忆和陈述性记忆的实验任务来评估这些组中的学习类型。使用序列反应时任务来测量程序性序列学习,使用加利福尼亚言语学习测试儿童版-西班牙语版1(CVLT-2)来测量陈述性外显学习。仅考虑代表学习的组块来评估学习能力,并在临床受试者和正常受试者中使用多变量方差分析进行比较。使用瑞文测试、简单反应时测试、手指敲击测试和有槽钉板测试来评估受试者的整体功能。将结果与同年龄对照组的结果以及可用的西班牙常模参照工具的结果进行比较。
结果表明,两个临床组均不存在程序性内隐学习,而两个组的陈述性外显学习均得以保持。
临床组表现出陈述性学习的保留和程序性学习的明显受损。结果支持小脑在程序性学习早期阶段的作用。