Suppr超能文献

年龄对内部介导扫视潜伏期和错误产生的影响。

Effects of age on latency and error generation in internally mediated saccades.

作者信息

Abel Larry A, Douglas Jacinta

机构信息

School of Orthoptics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

出版信息

Neurobiol Aging. 2007 Apr;28(4):627-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

Abstract

Most studies on the effects of ageing on saccades have examined reflexive saccades; the only commonly studied volitional task has been the antisaccade task, with contradictory results. We examined in both young and elderly normal subjects the latency of anti-, memory-guided, and predictable saccades and the timing of self-paced saccades; we also evaluated errors made on the first two tasks. We expected errors to be correlated between tasks; we also expected antisaccade latencies and errors to be inversely correlated. We also expected antisaccade and memory-guided saccade latencies to be longer in individuals with a high self-paced rate. Except for predictable saccades, mean latencies were significantly higher in the elderly. However, their performance was more variable. Errors were also significantly more frequent on anti- and memory-guided saccade tasks. Most of the hypothesised correlations were not observed. Analysis of error latencies showed that whilst most antisaccade errors were reflexive, for memory-guided saccades both express errors and errors with latencies between 0.4 and 2.5 s were observed. The latter appeared to be a premature release of what would otherwise have been a properly planned response. Age thus impaired all but the predictable saccade task; nevertheless, there were few relationships between measures across tasks. This suggests that a range of processes mediate peoples' performance on these saccade paradigms.

摘要

大多数关于衰老对扫视影响的研究都考察了反射性扫视;唯一常见的被研究的意志性任务是反扫视任务,但其结果相互矛盾。我们在年轻和老年正常受试者中研究了反扫视、记忆引导扫视和可预测扫视的潜伏期以及自我节奏扫视的时间;我们还评估了前两项任务中出现的错误。我们预期任务之间的错误存在相关性;我们还预期反扫视潜伏期和错误呈负相关。我们还预期在自我节奏率高的个体中,反扫视和记忆引导扫视的潜伏期会更长。除了可预测扫视外,老年人的平均潜伏期显著更长。然而,他们的表现更具变异性。在反扫视和记忆引导扫视任务中,错误也明显更频繁。大多数假设的相关性并未观察到。对错误潜伏期的分析表明,虽然大多数反扫视错误是反射性的,但对于记忆引导扫视,既观察到了表达性错误,也观察到了潜伏期在0.4至2.5秒之间的错误。后者似乎是原本会被正确计划的反应的过早释放。因此,衰老除了可预测扫视任务外,损害了所有任务;然而,不同任务的测量之间几乎没有关系。这表明一系列过程介导了人们在这些扫视范式中的表现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验