Knez Igor, Thorsson Sofia
Laboratory of Applied Psychology, Department of Technology and Built Environment, University of Gävle, 801 76, Gävle, Sweden.
Int J Biometeorol. 2006 May;50(5):258-68. doi: 10.1007/s00484-006-0024-0. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
The main objective of the present quasi-experimental study was to examine the influence of culture (Swedish vs Japanese) and environmental attitude (urban vs open-air person) on participants' thermal, emotional and perceptual assessments of a square, within the PET (physiological equivalent temperature) comfortable interval of 18-23 degrees C. It was predicted that persons living in different cultures with different environmental attitudes would psychologically evaluate a square differently despite similar thermal conditions. Consistent with this prediction, Japanese participants estimated the current weather as warmer than did Swedish participants and, consistent with this, they felt less thermally comfortable on the site, although participants in both countries perceived similar comfortable thermal outdoor conditions according to the PET index. Compared to the Japanese, the Swedes estimated both the current weather and the site as windier and colder, indicating a consistency in weather assessment on calm-windy and warm-cold scales in participants in both cultures. Furthermore, Swedish participants felt more glad and calm on the site and, in line with their character (more glad than gloomy), they estimated the square as more beautiful and pleasant than did Japanese participants. All this indicates that thermal, emotional and perceptual assessments of a physical place may be intertwined with psychological schema-based and socio-cultural processes, rather than fixed by general thermal indices developed in line with physiological heat balance models. In consequence, this implies that thermal comfort indices may not be applicable in different cultural/climate zones without modifications, and that they may not be appropriate if we do not take into account the psychological processes involved in environmental assessment.
本准实验研究的主要目的是,在18至23摄氏度的PET(生理等效温度)舒适区间内,考察文化(瑞典与日本)和环境态度(城市居民与户外爱好者)对参与者对一个广场的热感觉、情绪和感知评价的影响。研究预测,尽管热条件相似,但生活在不同文化中且具有不同环境态度的人,会对广场产生不同的心理评价。与这一预测一致的是,日本参与者估计当前天气比瑞典参与者感觉更温暖,与此相符的是,他们在现场感觉热舒适度较低,尽管根据PET指数,两国的参与者都感知到相似的舒适户外热条件。与日本人相比,瑞典人估计当前天气和广场的风更大、更冷,这表明两种文化的参与者在静风-有风以及温暖-寒冷尺度上的天气评估具有一致性。此外,瑞典参与者在现场感觉更愉悦、更平静,并且,与他们的性格相符(更愉悦而非忧郁),他们认为广场比日本参与者所认为的更美丽、更宜人。所有这些都表明,对一个物理场所的热感觉、情绪和感知评价可能与基于心理图式和社会文化的过程相互交织,而不是由根据生理热平衡模型制定的一般热指标所固定。因此,这意味着热舒适度指标在未经修改的情况下可能不适用于不同的文化/气候区,并且,如果我们不考虑环境评估中涉及的心理过程,它们可能并不合适。