Reddy M B, Cook J D
Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Oct;54(4):723-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/54.4.723.
Prior investigations have shown that rats are less sensitive than humans to dietary factors that influence the absorption of nonheme iron. This investigation was undertaken to determine whether this disparity is due to differences in the methods used to measure absorption in the two species. By use of identical methodology and test meals, absorption studies were performed in rats and humans to compare the effect of known dietary enhancers (ascorbic acid and meat) and inhibitors (tea, bran, and soy protein) on nonheme-iron absorption. Meat and tea had a marked effect on absorption in humans but did not influence absorption in rats. Although the effect of ascorbic acid, soy protein, and bran on absorption was statistically significant in rats, the absorptive response was far less than it was in humans. Our studies indicate that rodents cannot be used to assess the quantitative importance of dietary factors in human iron nutrition.
先前的研究表明,大鼠对影响非血红素铁吸收的饮食因素的敏感性低于人类。进行这项研究是为了确定这种差异是否是由于用于测量这两个物种铁吸收的方法不同所致。通过使用相同的方法和测试餐,在大鼠和人类中进行了吸收研究,以比较已知饮食增强剂(抗坏血酸和肉类)和抑制剂(茶、麸皮和大豆蛋白)对非血红素铁吸收的影响。肉类和茶对人类的铁吸收有显著影响,但对大鼠的铁吸收没有影响。尽管抗坏血酸、大豆蛋白和麸皮对大鼠铁吸收的影响在统计学上具有显著性,但吸收反应远低于人类。我们的研究表明,啮齿动物不能用于评估饮食因素在人类铁营养中的定量重要性。