• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Protocol for the immediate delivery versus expectant care of women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT) Trial [ISRCTN44485060].足月前胎膜早破(PPROMT)妇女立即分娩与期待治疗的试验方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN44485060]
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Mar 23;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-9.
2
Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial.足月前胎膜早破期待治疗与即刻分娩的随机对照试验(PPROMT 试验)
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):444-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00724-2. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
3
Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial).孕34至37周胎膜早破孕妇引产与期待治疗的比较(PPROMEXIL试验)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 6;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-11.
4
An economic evaluation of planned immediate versus delayed birth for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: findings from the PPROMT randomised controlled trial.计划性早产胎膜早破即刻分娩与延迟分娩的经济学评价:来自 PPROMT 随机对照试验的结果。
BJOG. 2017 Mar;124(4):623-630. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14302. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).孕28 - 32周胎膜早破时计划性早期分娩与期待治疗的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验(MICADO研究)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Planned delivery for pre-eclampsia between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation: the PHOENIX RCT.孕34至37周子痫前期的计划性分娩:PHOENIX随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Dec;27(28):1-22. doi: 10.3310/CWWH0622.
7
Economic analysis comparing induction of labor and expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (PPROMEXIL trial).比较 34-37 周胎膜早破孕妇行引产与期待治疗的经济学分析(PPROMEXIL 试验)。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Apr;93(4):374-81. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12329. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
8
Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled trial.计划性早产分娩或期待治疗对晚期早产儿先兆子痫(PHOENIX)的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1181-1190. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31963-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Active versus expectant management for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes at 34-36 weeks of completed gestation: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes.积极治疗与期待治疗对 34-36 孕周胎膜早破的效果比较:母亲和新生儿结局的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010 Jun;89(6):776-81. doi: 10.3109/00016341003674921.
10
Preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: a survey of current practice.胎膜早破:当前实践调查
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Oct;44(5):400-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00256.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.对于妊娠37周前胎膜早破的孕妇,计划早产与期待治疗以改善妊娠结局的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD004735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004735.pub4.
2
Induction of labor versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks: a randomized controlled trial.在 34 至 37 周之间胎膜早破的孕妇中进行引产与期待治疗的随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001208. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
3
Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis.临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的诊断与处理。
Clin Perinatol. 2010 Jun;37(2):339-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.02.003.
4
Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial).孕34至37周胎膜早破孕妇引产与期待治疗的比较(PPROMEXIL试验)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 6;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-11.

本文引用的文献

1
Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.对于妊娠37周前胎膜早破的孕妇,计划早产与期待治疗对改善妊娠结局的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD004735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004735.pub3.
2
Preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: a survey of current practice.胎膜早破:当前实践调查
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Oct;44(5):400-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00256.x.
3
Delivery at 34 weeks is more costly than at 35 weeks in pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes.对于胎膜早破的妊娠,孕34周分娩比孕35周分娩成本更高。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Jul;14(1):22-5. doi: 10.1080/jmf.14.1.22.25.
4
Consumer preference for dinoprostone vaginal gel using stated preference discrete choice modelling.使用陈述性偏好离散选择模型研究消费者对地诺前列酮阴道凝胶的偏好。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(10):721-35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321100-00004.
5
Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes.胎膜早破的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD001058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001058.
6
Preterm premature rupture of the membranes.胎膜早破(早产)
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;101(1):178-93. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02366-9.
7
Cost-effectiveness of induction after preterm premature rupture of the membranes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Nov;187(5):1153-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.127459.
8
Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care.评估女性对分娩期护理的偏好。
Birth. 2001 Dec;28(4):254-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00254.x.
9
Cerebral palsy and chorioamnionitis: the inflammatory cytokine link.
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001 Jul;56(7):433-6. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200107000-00023.
10
Chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral palsy: A meta-analysis.绒毛膜羊膜炎作为脑性瘫痪的一个风险因素:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2000 Sep 20;284(11):1417-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.11.1417.

足月前胎膜早破(PPROMT)妇女立即分娩与期待治疗的试验方案[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN44485060]

Protocol for the immediate delivery versus expectant care of women with preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT) Trial [ISRCTN44485060].

作者信息

Morris Jonathan M, Roberts Christine L, Crowther Caroline A, Buchanan Sarah L, Henderson-Smart David J, Salkeld Glenn

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Mar 23;6:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-9.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-6-9
PMID:16556323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1464097/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) complicates up to 2% of all pregnancies and is the cause of 40% of all preterm births. The optimal management of women with PPROM prior to 37 weeks, is not known. Furthermore, diversity in current clinical practice suggests uncertainty about the appropriate clinical management. There are two options for managing PPROM, expectant management (a wait and see approach) or early planned birth. Infection is the main risk for women in which management is expectant. This risk need to be balanced against the risk of iatrogenic prematurity if early delivery is planned. The different treatment options may also have different health care costs. Expectant management results in prolonged antenatal hospitalisation while planned early delivery may necessitate intensive care of the neonate for problems associated with prematurity.

METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of early planned birth compared with expectant management for women with PPROM between 34 weeks and 366 weeks gestation, in a randomised controlled trial. A secondary aim is a cost analysis to establish the economic impact of the two treatment options and establish the treatment preferences of women with PPROM close to term. The early planned birth group will be delivered within 24 hours according to local management protocols. In the expectant management group birth will occur after spontaneous labour, at term or when the attending clinician feels that birth is indicated according to usual care. Approximately 1812 women with PPROM at 34-366 weeks gestation will be recruited for the trial. The primary outcome of the study is neonatal sepsis. Secondary infant outcomes include respiratory distress, perinatal mortality, neonatal intensive care unit admission, assisted ventilation and early infant development. Secondary maternal outcomes include chorioamnionitis, postpartum infection treated with antibiotics, antepartum haemorrhage, induction of labour, mode of delivery, maternal satisfaction with care, duration of hospitalisation, and maternal wellbeing at four months postpartum.

DISCUSSION

This trial will provide evidence on the optimal care for women with PPROM close to term (34-37 weeks gestation). Consideration of both the clinical and economic sequelae of the management of PPROM will enable informed decision making and guideline development.

摘要

背景

胎膜早破(PPROM)在所有妊娠中发生率高达2%,是所有早产病例中40%的病因。孕37周前PPROM女性的最佳管理方案尚不清楚。此外,当前临床实践的多样性表明,对于适当的临床管理存在不确定性。PPROM的管理有两种选择,期待治疗(等待观察法)或早期计划分娩。感染是期待治疗女性面临的主要风险。这种风险需要与计划早期分娩时医源性早产的风险相权衡。不同的治疗方案可能也会有不同的医疗费用。期待治疗会导致产前住院时间延长,而计划早期分娩可能因早产相关问题而需要对新生儿进行重症监护。

方法/设计:我们旨在通过一项随机对照试验,评估孕34周和36⁺⁶周之间PPROM女性早期计划分娩与期待治疗相比的有效性。次要目标是进行成本分析,以确定两种治疗方案的经济影响,并确定接近足月的PPROM女性的治疗偏好。早期计划分娩组将根据当地管理方案在24小时内分娩。在期待治疗组中,分娩将在自然分娩后、足月时或主治医生根据常规护理认为需要分娩时进行。大约1812名孕34 - 36⁺⁶周的PPROM女性将被纳入该试验。该研究的主要结局是新生儿败血症。次要婴儿结局包括呼吸窘迫、围产期死亡率、新生儿重症监护病房入院、辅助通气和早期婴儿发育。次要母亲结局包括绒毛膜羊膜炎、用抗生素治疗的产后感染、产前出血、引产、分娩方式、母亲对护理的满意度、住院时间以及产后四个月时的母亲健康状况。

讨论

这项试验将为接近足月(孕34 - 37周)的PPROM女性的最佳护理提供证据。考虑PPROM管理的临床和经济后果将有助于做出明智的决策并制定指南。