Suppr超能文献

基底型偏头痛:临床、流行病学及遗传学特征

Basilar-type migraine: clinical, epidemiologic, and genetic features.

作者信息

Kirchmann Malene, Thomsen Lise Lykke, Olesen Jes

机构信息

Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Neurology. 2006 Mar 28;66(6):880-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000203647.48422.dd.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain whether basilar-type migraine (BM) is a subtype of migraine with typical aura (MTA) or a distinct phenotype or genotype.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the symptomatology, familial distribution, and genotype of BM.

METHODS

The authors recruited 105 families comprising 362 patients with MTA or BM (International Classification of Headache Disorders-1 criteria). Among these patients, 38 patients from 29 families had BM. In 12 of the families with BM with an apparently dominant inheritance the authors sequenced all exons of the CACNA1A (chromosome 19) and ATP1A2 (chromosome 1) genes responsible for most cases of the autosomal dominantly inherited familial hemiplegic migraine and performed a linkage analysis of chromosome 1 and 19 with a nonparametric or autosomal dominant parametric model using an affected only analysis.

RESULTS

BM occurred in 10% (38/362) of patients with MTA. The basilar-type aura had a median duration of 60 minutes and comprised vertigo 61%, dysarthria 53%, tinnitus 45%, diplopia 45%, bilateral visual symptoms 40%, bilateral paresthesias 24%, decreased level of consciousness 21%, hypacusia 21%, and ataxia 5%. The relative frequency of the individual basilar-type symptoms was not different from patients with hemiplegic migraine from a previous study. The patients with BM were equally distributed among the 105 families with MTA (p = 0.37). The attacks of MTA were identical in families with or without BM. No causative mutations and no linkage was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Basilar-type aura seemingly may occur at times in any patient with migraine with typical aura. There is no firm clinical, epidemiologic, or genetic evidence that BM is an independent disease entity different from MTA.

摘要

背景

基底型偏头痛(BM)究竟是伴有典型先兆的偏头痛(MTA)的一个亚型,还是一种独特的表型或基因型,目前仍不确定。

目的

分析基底型偏头痛的症状学、家族分布及基因型。

方法

作者招募了105个家庭,共362例患有MTA或BM的患者(依据国际头痛疾病分类第1版标准)。在这些患者中,来自29个家庭的38例患者患有BM。在12个具有明显显性遗传的BM家庭中,作者对负责大多数常染色体显性遗传性家族性偏瘫性偏头痛病例的CACNA1A(19号染色体)和ATP1A2(1号染色体)基因的所有外显子进行了测序,并使用仅受累分析,采用非参数或常染色体显性参数模型对1号和19号染色体进行连锁分析。

结果

BM发生于10%(38/362)的MTA患者中。基底型先兆的中位持续时间为60分钟,包括眩晕(61%)、构音障碍(53%)、耳鸣(45%)、复视(45%)、双侧视觉症状(40%)、双侧感觉异常(24%)、意识水平下降(21%)、听力减退(21%)和共济失调(5%)。个体基底型症状的相对频率与先前一项研究中偏瘫性偏头痛患者并无差异。BM患者在105个MTA家庭中分布均匀(p = 0.37)。有或无BM的家庭中MTA发作情况相同。未发现致病突变,也未确定连锁关系。

结论

基底型先兆似乎有时可能出现在任何伴有典型先兆的偏头痛患者中。没有确凿的临床、流行病学或遗传学证据表明BM是不同于MTA的独立疾病实体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验