Smelcerovic Andrija, Spiteller Michael, Zuehlke Sebastian
Institute of Environmental Research (INFU), University of Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 6, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany.
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Apr 5;54(7):2750-3. doi: 10.1021/jf0527246.
Renewed interest in plant-derived drugs has led to an increased need for efficient extraction methods. Hypericum perforatum L. contains several groups of bioactive compounds with noteworthy pharmacological activities. Direct sonication of H. perforatum was investigated and compared with conventional maceration, indirect sonication, Soxhlet extraction, and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). Highly selective liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analysis showed that the content of six investigated active compounds (hypericin, pseudohypericin, hyperoside, rutin, quercitrin, and hyperforin) in extracts obtained by direct sonication was significantly higher than in extracts obtained by the other methods. The active compound contents increased on increasing the ultrasonic power from 40 to 60 W when using direct sonication. Conventional maceration gave the lowest amount of analyzed active compounds. Soxhlet extraction gave better results than ASE or indirect sonication.
对植物源药物的重新关注导致对高效提取方法的需求增加。贯叶连翘含有几组具有显著药理活性的生物活性化合物。对贯叶连翘的直接超声处理进行了研究,并与传统浸渍法、间接超声处理、索氏提取法和加速溶剂萃取法(ASE)进行了比较。高选择性液相色谱/串联质谱分析表明,直接超声处理得到的提取物中六种被研究的活性化合物(金丝桃素、假金丝桃素、金丝桃苷、芦丁、槲皮苷和贯叶连翘素)的含量显著高于其他方法得到的提取物。使用直接超声处理时,随着超声功率从40瓦增加到60瓦,活性化合物含量增加。传统浸渍法得到的分析活性化合物含量最低。索氏提取法比ASE或间接超声处理效果更好。