Kockler Tim R, Stanford Matthew S, Nelson Chad E, Meloy J Reid, Sanford Keith
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, USA.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 Jan;76(1):80-5. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.80.
The concept of a dichotomous versus a continuous aggression model continues to be debated within the research literature. The Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale (IPAS; M. S. Stanford, R. J. Houston, C. W. Mathias, et al., 2003) is a newly developed self-report instrument designed to classify an individual's aggressive behavior as predominantly premeditated or predominantly impulsive. The IPAS consists of 30-items that are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. This study used a nonrandom sample of convenience (N = 85) from a forensic state hospital. Principal-components analysis of the 30 items revealed 2 distinct factors (Impulsive and Premeditated Aggression), which accounted for 33% of the variance. The results of this study further validate the bimodal classification of aggression through its application to a forensic sample. The implications for general assessment, diagnosis, and treatment are discussed.
二分法与连续攻击模型的概念在研究文献中仍存在争议。冲动/预谋攻击量表(IPAS;M.S.斯坦福、R.J.休斯顿、C.W.马蒂亚斯等人,2003年)是一种新开发的自我报告工具,旨在将个体的攻击行为分类为主要是预谋的或主要是冲动的。IPAS由30个项目组成,采用5点李克特量表计分。本研究使用了来自一所法医州立医院的非随机便利样本(N = 85)。对30个项目进行主成分分析,发现了2个不同的因素(冲动攻击和预谋攻击),它们解释了33%的方差。本研究结果通过将其应用于法医样本,进一步验证了攻击行为的双峰分类。文中还讨论了其对一般评估、诊断和治疗的意义。