García-Forero Carlos, Gallardo-Pujol David, Maydeu-Olivares Alberto, Andrés-Pueyo Antonio
Department of Personality, University of Barcelona, Pg. de la Vall d'Hebron, 171, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Jun 30;168(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.04.002. Epub 2009 May 22.
There is confusion in the literature concerning the concept of impulsive aggression. Based on previous research, we hypothesize that impulsivity and aggression may be related, though not as closely as to consider them the same construct. So, our aim was to provide empirical evidence of the relationship between the impulsivity and aggressiveness constructs when considered as traits. Two widely used questionnaires [Barratt's Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) and Aggression Questionnaire-Refined (AQ-R)] were administered to 768 healthy respondents. Product-moment and canonical correlations were then calculated. In addition, a principal components analysis was conducted to explore whether impulsive aggression can be defined phenotypically as the expression of a single trait. The common variance between impulsivity and aggressiveness was never higher than 42%. The principal components analysis reveals that one component is not enough to represent all the variables. In conclusion, our results show that impulsivity and aggressiveness are two separate, although related constructs. This is particularly important in view of the misconceptions in the literature.
关于冲动性攻击的概念,文献中存在混淆。基于先前的研究,我们假设冲动性和攻击性可能相关,尽管其关联程度不至于将它们视为相同的结构。因此,我们的目的是提供实证证据,以证明将冲动性和攻击性结构视为特质时它们之间的关系。我们对768名健康受访者进行了两份广泛使用的问卷[巴拉特冲动性量表(BIS)和修订版攻击问卷(AQ-R)]的施测。然后计算了积差相关和典型相关。此外,进行了主成分分析,以探讨冲动性攻击是否可以在表型上被定义为单一特质的表达。冲动性和攻击性之间的共同方差从未高于42%。主成分分析表明,一个成分不足以代表所有变量。总之,我们的结果表明,冲动性和攻击性是两个独立但相关的结构。鉴于文献中的误解,这一点尤为重要。