Suppr超能文献

多维疼痛量表脊髓损伤版本的内部一致性、稳定性和效度

Internal consistency, stability, and validity of the spinal cord injury version of the multidimensional pain inventory.

作者信息

Widerström-Noga Eva G, Cruz-Almeida Yenisel, Martinez-Arizala Alberto, Turk Dennis C

机构信息

VA Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Apr;87(4):516-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.12.036.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the internal consistency, stability, and construct validity of a spinal cord injury (SCI) version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-SCI).

DESIGN

Interview.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs medical center and university-based institute.

PARTICIPANTS

Community sample of persons with SCI and chronic pain (N=161).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The MPI-SCI.

RESULTS

The internal consistency of the MPI-SCI subscales ranged from fair (.60) for affective distress to substantial (.94) for pain interference with activities. The subscales of the MPI-SCI (ie, life interference [r=.81], affective distress [r=.71], solicitous responses [r=.86], distracting responses [r=.85], general activity [r=.69], pain interference with activities [r=.78], pain severity [r=.69], negative responses [r=.69]) showed adequate stability. In contrast, the stability of the support (r=.59) and the life control subscales (r=.31) was unacceptably low. All MPI-SCI subscales with the exception of the perceived responses by significant others subscales showed good convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPI-SCI appears to be a reasonable measure for evaluating chronic pain impact after SCI. In clinical trials, however, supplementary instruments should be included to assess changes in affect, social support, and perceptions of life control.

摘要

目的

评估多维疼痛量表脊髓损伤版(MPI-SCI)的内部一致性、稳定性和结构效度。

设计

访谈。

地点

退伍军人事务医疗中心和大学附属机构。

参与者

脊髓损伤和慢性疼痛患者的社区样本(N = 161)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

MPI-SCI。

结果

MPI-SCI各分量表的内部一致性从情感困扰方面的中等(0.60)到疼痛对活动干扰方面的高(0.94)不等。MPI-SCI的分量表(即生活干扰[r = 0.81]、情感困扰[r = 0.71]、关切反应[r = 0.86]、分散注意力反应[r = 0.85]、一般活动[r = 0.69]、疼痛对活动的干扰[r = 0.78]、疼痛严重程度[r = 0.69]、消极反应[r = 0.69])显示出足够的稳定性。相比之下,支持分量表(r = 0.59)和生活控制分量表(r = 0.31)的稳定性低得令人无法接受。除重要他人感知反应分量表外,所有MPI-SCI分量表均显示出良好的聚合效度、区分效度和同时效度。

结论

MPI-SCI似乎是评估脊髓损伤后慢性疼痛影响的合理工具。然而,在临床试验中,应纳入补充工具以评估情感、社会支持和生活控制感的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验