Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤痉挛评估工具:开发与评估

The spinal cord injury spasticity evaluation tool: development and evaluation.

作者信息

Adams Melanie M, Ginis Kathleen A Martin, Hicks Audrey L

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Sep;88(9):1185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and assess the reliability and validity of a new scale designed to measure the impact of spasticity on daily life in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Scale development and assessment.

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling persons with chronic SCI and spasticity participated in study 1 (n=9), study 2 (n=19), and study 3 (n=61).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Study 1: participant definitions of spasticity and list of scale items. Study 2: scale refinement, face validity, and time to complete. Study 3: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.

RESULTS

The Spinal Cord Injury Spasticity Evaluation Tool (SCI-SET) is a 7-day recall self-report questionnaire that takes into account both the problematic and useful effects of spasticity on daily life in people with SCI. The scale exhibited good face validity and required 6.8+/-2.6 minutes to complete. The internal consistency (alpha) and intraclass correlation coefficient of the SCI-SET were .90 and .91, respectively. Construct validity was supported by correlations (r range, -.48 to .68; P<.01) between SCI-SET scores and theoretically meaningful constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

The SCI-SET fills a need for a reliable and valid self-report measure of the impact of spasticity on daily life in people with SCI, taking into account both the problematic and useful effects of spasticity.

摘要

目的

开发并评估一种新量表的信效度,该量表旨在测量痉挛对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者日常生活的影响。

设计

量表开发与评估。

地点

普通社区。

参与者

患有慢性SCI和痉挛的社区居住者参与了研究1(n = 9)、研究2(n = 19)和研究3(n = 61)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要结局指标

研究1:参与者对痉挛的定义及量表项目清单。研究2:量表完善、表面效度及完成时间。研究3:内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。

结果

脊髓损伤痉挛评估工具(SCI-SET)是一份为期7天的回顾性自评问卷,该问卷兼顾了痉挛对SCI患者日常生活产生的问题和有益影响。该量表具有良好的表面效度,完成时间为6.8±2.6分钟。SCI-SET的内部一致性(α)和组内相关系数分别为0.90和0.91。SCI-SET得分与理论上有意义的结构之间的相关性(r范围为-0.48至0.68;P<0.01)支持了结构效度。

结论

SCI-SET满足了对一种可靠且有效的自评工具的需求,该工具可用于测量痉挛对SCI患者日常生活的影响,同时兼顾了痉挛的问题和有益影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验