Suppr超能文献

谁在照顾谁?重症患者与其家庭照顾者之间的不同观点。

Who's caring for whom? Differing perspectives between seriously ill patients and their family caregivers.

作者信息

Hauser Joshua M, Chang Chih-Hung, Alpert Hillel, Baldwin DeWitt, Emanuel Ezekiel J, Emanuel Linda

机构信息

Buehler Center on Aging, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Mar-Apr;23(2):105-12. doi: 10.1177/104990910602300207.

Abstract

Although clinicians and researchers often rely on family members 'reports of a wide range of dying patients' symptoms and care preferences, available data indicate divergences between the two. We used a national sample to analyze patient-caregiver pairs to explore areas of concordance and nonconcordance about physical symptoms, communication with physicians, caregiving needs, and future fears. We also assessed whether identifiable patient or caregiver characteristics were associated with nonconcordance. Our data were from a national, random sample of 988 terminally ill patients, of whom 893 had caregivers who were also interviewed. Frequencies and types of nonconcordance were computed for patient-caregiver pairs. Bivariate associations between patient and caregiver reports on each item were tested. Logistic and conditional logistic regression analyses assessed multiple predictors of nonconcordance for each item. Primary diagnoses included cancer (51.1 percent), heart disease (17. 7 percent), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10. 7 percent), and other diseases (20.5 percent). The proportion of concordant reports among pairs of patients and caregivers ranged from 53 percent to 66 percent. Among pairs showing nonconcordant responses, caregivers reported higher levels of pain and disability than patients, lower caregiving needs, and different fears about the future. Few demographic or clinical predictors were associated with nonconcordance. Concordance between patients 'and their caregivers' responses ranged widely, and there were important areas of nonconcordant responses. When responses differed, patients were more likely to express concern about domains that might impose on caregivers, while caregivers were more likely to express concern about patients 'physical suffering. Consistent sociodemographic or clinical predictors of nonconcordant responses were not found. These data suggest important ways that patient and caregiver reports of the same experience vary.

摘要

尽管临床医生和研究人员常常依赖家庭成员对众多临终患者症状及护理偏好的报告,但现有数据表明二者之间存在差异。我们使用全国性样本分析患者与护理者配对情况,以探究在身体症状、与医生沟通、护理需求及对未来的担忧等方面的一致和不一致之处。我们还评估了是否有可识别的患者或护理者特征与不一致情况相关。我们的数据来自全国范围内随机抽取的988名绝症患者,其中893名患者的护理者也接受了访谈。计算了患者与护理者配对的不一致频率和类型。对患者和护理者在每个项目上的报告进行了双变量关联测试。逻辑回归和条件逻辑回归分析评估了每个项目不一致情况的多个预测因素。主要诊断包括癌症(51.1%)、心脏病(17.7%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(10.7%)和其他疾病(20.5%)。患者与护理者配对报告中的一致比例在53%至66%之间。在回答不一致的配对中,护理者报告的疼痛和残疾程度高于患者,护理需求较低,且对未来的担忧不同。几乎没有人口统计学或临床预测因素与不一致情况相关。患者及其护理者的回答之间的一致性差异很大,存在重要的不一致回答领域。当回答不同时,患者更有可能表达对可能给护理者带来负担的领域的担忧,而护理者更有可能表达对患者身体痛苦的担忧。未发现不一致回答的一致社会人口统计学或临床预测因素。这些数据表明了患者和护理者对相同经历的报告存在差异的重要方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验