Vladusich Tony, Hemmi Jan M, Zeil Jochen
Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology and NeuroImaging Centre, School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Exp Biol. 2006 Apr;209(Pt 8):1367-75. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02156.
We report on a striking asymmetry in search behaviour observed in honeybees trained to forage alternately at one of two feeder sites in a narrow tunnel. Bees were trained by periodically switching the position of a sucrose reward between relatively short and long distances in the tunnel. Search behaviour was examined in the training tunnel itself and in a fresh tunnel devoid of scent cues deposited by bees during training. Bees tested in the fresh tunnel exhibited a bias towards the shorter site, while bees tested in the training tunnel searched closer to the longer site. In additional experiments, we manipulated the position of scent cues, relative to the training location, in the testing tunnel. Bees generally searched at the site to which they were trained rather than at the position of the scent. Our data argue strongly against the hypothesis that bees rely exclusively on deposited scent to accurately localise a food source in natural foraging environments. We instead conclude that odometry and scent guidance contribute to honeybee food search in a manner reflecting the significance and relative reliability of sensory information.
我们报告了在狭窄隧道中接受训练、交替在两个喂食点之一觅食的蜜蜂所表现出的显著搜索行为不对称性。通过定期在隧道中相对短距离和长距离之间切换蔗糖奖励的位置来训练蜜蜂。在训练隧道本身以及没有蜜蜂在训练期间留下气味线索的新隧道中检查搜索行为。在新隧道中测试的蜜蜂表现出对较短喂食点的偏向,而在训练隧道中测试的蜜蜂则在更靠近较长喂食点的地方搜索。在额外的实验中,我们在测试隧道中相对于训练位置操纵了气味线索的位置。蜜蜂通常在它们接受训练的地点搜索,而不是在气味的位置。我们的数据有力地反驳了蜜蜂在自然觅食环境中仅依靠沉积的气味来准确定位食物来源的假设。相反,我们得出结论,里程测量和气味引导以反映感官信息的重要性和相对可靠性的方式,对蜜蜂的食物搜索有贡献。