First Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 45-47 Ypsilantou Str, Athens, 10675, Greece.
Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R228. doi: 10.1186/cc9380. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
Intensive care may prolong the dying process in patients who have been unresponsive to the treatment already provided. Limitation of life-sustaining therapy, by either withholding or withdrawing support, is an ethically acceptable and common worldwide practice. The purpose of the present study was to examine the frequency, types, and rationale of limiting life support in Greek intensive care units (ICUs), the clinical and demographic parameters associated with it, and the participation of relatives in decision making.
This was a prospective observational study conducted in eight Greek multidisciplinary ICUs. We studied all consecutive ICU patients who died, excluding those who stayed in the ICU less than 48 hours or were brain dead.
Three hundred six patients composed the study population, with a mean age of 64 years and a mean APACHE II score on admission of 21. Of study patients, 41% received full support, including unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); 48% died after withholding of CPR; 8%, after withholding of other treatment modalities besides CPR; and 3%, after withdrawal of treatment. Patients in whom therapy was limited had a longer ICU (P < 0.01) and hospital (P = 0.01) length of stay, a lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) on admission (P < 0.01), a higher APACHE II score 24 hours before death (P < 0.01), and were more likely to be admitted with a neurologic diagnosis (P < 0.01). Patients who received full support were more likely to be admitted with either a cardiovascular (P = 0.02) or trauma diagnosis (P = 0.05) and to be surgical rather than medical (P = 0.05). The main factors that influenced the physician's decision were, when providing full support, reversibility of illness and prognostic uncertainty, whereas, when limiting therapy, unresponsiveness to treatment already offered, prognosis of underlying chronic disease, and prognosis of acute disorder. Relatives' participation in decision making occurred in 20% of cases and was more frequent when a decision to provide full support was made (P < 0.01). Advance directives were rare (1%).
Limitation of life-sustaining treatment is a common phenomenon in the Greek ICUs studied. However, in a large majority of cases, it is equivalent to the withholding of CPR alone. Withholding of other therapies besides CPR and withdrawal of support are infrequent. Medical paternalism predominates in decision making.
在已经对治疗无反应的患者中,重症监护可能会延长死亡过程。通过停止或撤回支持来限制维持生命的治疗,是一种在伦理上可接受的且在全球范围内普遍的做法。本研究的目的是检查希腊重症监护病房(ICU)中限制生命支持的频率、类型和基本原理,以及与它相关的临床和人口统计学参数,和亲属在决策中的参与度。
这是一项在希腊 8 个多学科 ICU 中进行的前瞻性观察性研究。我们研究了所有在 ICU 中死亡的连续患者,排除那些在 ICU 中停留时间少于 48 小时或脑死亡的患者。
306 名患者构成了研究人群,平均年龄为 64 岁,入院时平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统 II(APACHE II)评分为 21 分。在研究患者中,41%接受了全面支持,包括不成功的心肺复苏(CPR);48%在停止 CPR 后死亡;8%在停止 CPR 以外的其他治疗方法后死亡;3%在停止治疗后死亡。接受治疗限制的患者 ICU(P<0.01)和医院(P=0.01)的住院时间更长,入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分较低(P<0.01),死亡前 24 小时的 APACHE II 评分较高(P<0.01),并且更有可能因神经系统诊断而入院(P<0.01)。接受全面支持的患者更有可能因心血管疾病(P=0.02)或创伤诊断(P=0.05)而入院,并且更有可能接受手术治疗而不是药物治疗(P=0.05)。影响医生决策的主要因素是,在提供全面支持时,疾病的可逆性和预后的不确定性,而在限制治疗时,对已提供的治疗无反应、基础慢性疾病的预后以及急性疾病的预后。亲属参与决策的情况发生在 20%的病例中,当做出提供全面支持的决定时更为常见(P<0.01)。预先指示很少见(1%)。
在研究的希腊 ICU 中,限制维持生命的治疗是一种常见现象。然而,在大多数情况下,它等同于单独停止心肺复苏。除心肺复苏以外停止其他治疗和撤回支持的情况并不常见。医疗家长式作风在决策中占主导地位。