Willis S, Hölzl F, Wein B, Tittel A, Schumpelick V
Department of Surgery, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Feb;22(2):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0124-7. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis or colonic side-to-end anastomosis is the reconstruction of choice after low anterior resection. However, the mechanisms of defecation after both reconstruction forms are still speculative.
Low anterior rectal resections were performed in 12 dogs with six colonic J-pouch-anal (pouch) and six coloanal side-to-end (SE) reconstructions. Four months postoperative stool frequency, intestinal transit time, and neorectal compliance were determined by radiography and barostat. Defecation mechanisms were evaluated radiographically during expulsion of artificial stool.
One dog with pouch reconstruction could not be evaluated due to an anastomotic leak, while the others had uncomplicated course. Spontaneous stool frequency was significantly increased with both reconstruction methods (control 2.0+/-0.9, pouch 2.7+/-1.2, SE 3.3+/-0.9 day; p<0.05). Intestinal transit time was significantly higher with pouch reconstruction due to storage of stool in the pouch and the descending colon compared to SE (control 760+/-82, pouch 592+/-97, SE 550+/-87 min; p<0.05). Compliance and functional capacity were higher in pouch than in side-to-end reconstructions (pouch 5.0+/-0.7 ml/mmHg, 124+/-23 ml; SE 2.7+/-0.3 ml/mmHg, 92+/-24 ml; p<0.05). During defecation, there were no contractions of the pouch detectable.
The colonic J-pouch reconstruction results in better functional outcome than side-to-end coloanal anastomosis. Our results show that pouch evacuation is passive and independent from pouch motility. The functional principle of the colonic J-pouch is not its reservoir function but a delay of colonic motility.
结肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术或结肠端侧吻合术是低位前切除术后的首选重建方式。然而,这两种重建方式后的排便机制仍存在推测。
对12只犬进行低位直肠前切除术,其中6只采用结肠J形贮袋肛管(贮袋)重建,6只采用结肠肛管端侧(SE)重建。术后4个月,通过放射学检查和压力测定仪确定大便频率、肠道传输时间和新直肠顺应性。在排出人工粪便期间通过放射学检查评估排便机制。
1只采用贮袋重建的犬因吻合口漏无法评估,其他犬病程顺利。两种重建方法均使自发大便频率显著增加(对照组2.0±0.9次/天,贮袋组2.7±1.2次/天,SE组3.3±0.9次/天;p<0.05)。与SE组相比,由于贮袋和降结肠中粪便的储存,贮袋重建的肠道传输时间显著更长(对照组760±82分钟,贮袋组592±97分钟,SE组550±87分钟;p<0.05)。贮袋组的顺应性和功能容量高于端侧重建组(贮袋组5.0±0.7 ml/mmHg,124±23 ml;SE组2.7±0.3 ml/mmHg,92±24 ml;p<0.05)。排便期间,未检测到贮袋有收缩。
结肠J形贮袋重建的功能结果优于结肠肛管端侧吻合术。我们的结果表明,贮袋排空是被动的,且与贮袋运动无关。结肠J形贮袋的功能原理不是其储存功能,而是结肠运动的延迟。