Suppr超能文献

公共开放空间的可利用性在各地区之间是否公平?

Is availability of public open space equitable across areas?

作者信息

Timperio A, Ball K, Salmon J, Roberts R, Crawford D

机构信息

Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.

出版信息

Health Place. 2007 Jun;13(2):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Apr 3.

Abstract

This study examined whether availability of public open spaces that can be used for recreation varies according to neighbourhood socio-economic disadvantage. Density and area of public open spaces were examined using a geographic information system and postal boundaries were used to define neighbourhoods. Neighbourhood socio-economic status (SES) was stratified into quintiles. Once neighbourhood population and geographic area were considered there were no differences in the number or total area of free-access, restricted access or sporting/recreation open spaces across quintiles of neighbourhood SES. Future research should examine whether the quality of public open spaces differ by neighbourhood SES.

摘要

本研究调查了可用于休闲娱乐的公共开放空间的可用性是否因邻里社会经济劣势而异。使用地理信息系统检查公共开放空间的密度和面积,并使用邮政边界来定义邻里。邻里社会经济地位(SES)被分为五个等级。在考虑邻里人口和地理区域后,邻里SES五个等级之间的免费进入、受限进入或体育/娱乐开放空间的数量或总面积没有差异。未来的研究应调查公共开放空间的质量是否因邻里SES而异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验