Benton Stephen L, Downey Ronald G, Glider Peggy S, Benton Sherry A, Shin Kanghyun, Newton Douglas W, Arck William, Price Amy
Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506-5312, USA.
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 May;67(3):399-405. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.399.
This study explored how much variance in college student negative drinking consequences is explained by descriptive norm perception, beyond that accounted for by student gender and self-reported alcohol use.
A derivation sample (N=7565; 54% women) and a replication sample (N=8924; 55.5% women) of undergraduate students completed the Campus Alcohol Survey in classroom settings.
Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that student gender and average number of drinks when "partying" were significantly related to harmful consequences resulting from drinking. Men reported more consequences than did women, and drinking amounts were positively correlated with consequences. However, descriptive norm perception did not explain any additional variance beyond that attributed to gender and alcohol use. Furthermore, there was no significant three-way interaction among student gender, alcohol use, and descriptive norm perception.
Norm perception contributed no significant variance in explaining harmful consequences beyond that explained by college student gender and alcohol use.
本研究探讨了除学生性别和自我报告的饮酒情况外，描述性规范认知能在多大程度上解释大学生负面饮酒后果的差异。
一个衍生样本（N = 7565；54%为女性）和一个复制样本（N = 8924；55.5%为女性）的本科生在课堂环境中完成了校园酒精调查。
分层回归分析显示，学生性别和“聚会”时的平均饮酒量与饮酒产生的有害后果显著相关。男性报告的后果比女性更多，且饮酒量与后果呈正相关。然而，描述性规范认知并不能解释除性别和饮酒情况之外的任何额外差异。此外，学生性别、饮酒情况和描述性规范认知之间不存在显著的三向交互作用。
在解释有害后果方面，规范认知除了由大学生性别和饮酒情况所解释的部分外，没有显著差异。
