• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会规范是重度饮酒大学生结果的最佳预测指标吗?

Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

作者信息

Neighbors Clayton, Lee Christine M, Lewis Melissa A, Fossos Nicole, Larimer Mary E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Box 354694, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul;68(4):556-65. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.556.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.556
PMID:17568961
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2443637/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This research was designed to evaluate the relative contribution of social norms, demographics, drinking motives, and alcohol expectancies in predicting alcohol consumption and related problems among heavy-drinking college students.

METHOD

Participants included 818 (57.6% women) first-year undergraduates who reported at least one heavy-drinking episode in the previous month. In addition to providing demographic information (gender and fraternity/sorority membership) participants completed Web-based assessments of social norms (perceived descriptive norms regarding typical student drinking, injunctive norms regarding friends' and parents' approval), motives (social, enhancement, coping, and conformity), and expectancies and evaluations of positive and negative alcohol effects.

RESULTS

Regression results indicated that descriptive and injunctive norms were among the best predictors of college student drinking. With respect to alcohol problems, results indicated that coping motives accounted for the largest proportion of unique variance. Finally, results revealed that alcohol consumption mediated the relationships between predictors and problems for social norms, whereas coping motives, negative expectancies, and evaluation of negative effects were directly associated with alcohol problems despite having relatively weak or null unique associations with consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study substantiate social norms as being among the best predictors of alcohol consumption in this population and suggest that drinking to cope is a better predictor of problems. The findings are discussed in terms of practical prevention and treatment implications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估社会规范、人口统计学因素、饮酒动机和饮酒预期在预测重度饮酒大学生的酒精消费及相关问题方面的相对贡献。

方法

研究对象包括818名(57.6%为女性)一年级本科生,他们报告在前一个月至少有一次重度饮酒经历。除了提供人口统计学信息(性别和兄弟会/姐妹会成员身份)外,参与者还完成了基于网络的社会规范评估(对典型学生饮酒的感知描述性规范、对朋友和父母认可的指令性规范)、动机(社交、增强、应对和从众)以及对酒精正负效应的预期和评价。

结果

回归结果表明,描述性和指令性规范是大学生饮酒的最佳预测因素之一。关于酒精问题,结果表明应对动机在独特方差中占比最大。最后,结果显示酒精消费在社会规范预测因素与问题之间起中介作用,而应对动机、消极预期和对消极影响的评价与酒精问题直接相关,尽管它们与消费的独特关联相对较弱或不存在。

结论

本研究结果证实社会规范是该人群酒精消费的最佳预测因素之一,并表明为应对而饮酒是问题的更好预测因素。研究结果从实际预防和治疗意义的角度进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?社会规范是重度饮酒大学生结果的最佳预测指标吗?
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul;68(4):556-65. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.556.
2
Social motives and the interaction between descriptive and injunctive norms in college student drinking.大学生饮酒中的社会动机以及描述性规范与指令性规范之间的相互作用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Sep;68(5):714-21. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.714.
3
Broad social motives, alcohol use, and related problems: Mechanisms of risk from high school through college.广泛的社会动机、饮酒及相关问题:从高中到大学的风险机制。
Addict Behav. 2011 Mar;36(3):222-30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
4
The relative impact of injunctive norms on college student drinking: the role of reference group.禁令性规范对大学生饮酒的相对影响:参照群体的作用。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Dec;22(4):576-81. doi: 10.1037/a0013043.
5
The role of social drinking motives in the relationship between social norms and alcohol consumption.社交饮酒动机在社会规范与饮酒行为关系中的作用。
Addict Behav. 2012 Dec;37(12):1335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
6
Examining the associations among severity of injunctive drinking norms, alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related negative consequences: the moderating roles of alcohol consumption and identity.考察约束性饮酒规范严重程度、饮酒量和与酒精相关的负面后果之间的关联:饮酒和身份的调节作用。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Jun;24(2):177-89. doi: 10.1037/a0018302.
7
A Longitudinal Examination of the Associations Between Shyness, Drinking Motives, Alcohol Use, and Alcohol-Related Problems.害羞、饮酒动机、酒精使用及酒精相关问题之间关联的纵向研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Sep;39(9):1749-55. doi: 10.1111/acer.12799. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
8
College cannabis use: the unique roles of social norms, motives, and expectancies.大学生大麻使用:社会规范、动机和期望的独特作用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013 Sep;74(5):720-6. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.720.
9
Social anxiety among young adult drinkers: the role of perceived norms and drinking motives.年轻成年饮酒者的社交焦虑:感知规范和饮酒动机的作用。
J Drug Educ. 2012;42(3):293-313. doi: 10.2190/DE.42.3.c.
10
Whose opinion matters? The relationship between injunctive norms and alcohol consequences in college students.谁的意见重要?规范禁令与大学生酒精后果的关系。
Addict Behav. 2010 Apr;35(4):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.003. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Social context of drinking moderates associations between descriptive norms and alcohol consumption among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.饮酒的社会背景调节了新冠疫情期间大学生描述性规范与酒精消费之间的关联。
J Am Coll Health. 2025 Jul 9:1-7. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2025.2520375.
2
Demographic Correlates Associated with Blackout Rage Gallon (BORG) Drinking Knowledge and Participation Among College Students.与大学生中黑out愤怒加仑(BORG)饮酒知识及参与情况相关的人口统计学关联因素。
Subst Use Misuse. 2025 Jun 17:1-5. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2025.2519402.
3
Are online norms-based alcohol interventions efficacious for college students with higher social anxiety?基于规范的在线酒精干预措施对社交焦虑程度较高的大学生是否有效?
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1111/acer.70077.
4
Predictors of alcohol use disorder risk in young adults: Direct and indirect psychological paths through binge drinking.年轻成年人酒精使用障碍风险的预测因素:通过暴饮的直接和间接心理路径
PLoS One. 2025 May 9;20(5):e0321974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321974. eCollection 2025.
5
Alcohol and Cannabis Perceived Descriptive and Injunctive Norms, Personal Use, and Consequences Among 2-Year College Students.两年制大学生对酒精和大麻的感知描述性和指令性规范、个人使用情况及后果
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 22;15(3):251. doi: 10.3390/bs15030251.
6
Longitudinal analysis for between- and within-person influences of descriptive alcohol drinking norms and attitudes on drinking outcomes.关于描述性饮酒规范和态度对饮酒结果的个体间和个体内影响的纵向分析。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Apr;49(4):883-892. doi: 10.1111/acer.70008. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
7
Influencer Drinking Norms: Cross-Sectional Mediators of Alcohol-Related Social Media and College Drinking.有影响力者饮酒规范:与酒精相关的社交媒体和大学生饮酒的横断面中介因素
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(4):596-603. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2445848. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
8
The Interplay Between Negative Alcohol Expectancies and Locus of Control and Its Association with Motivation to Change Alcohol Use Among Repeat Alcohol-Impaired Drivers.消极饮酒预期与控制点之间的相互作用及其与再次因酒精影响驾驶的司机改变饮酒行为动机的关联。
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(6):854-862. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2025.2454665. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
9
Young adult impaired driving behaviors and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use.年轻成年人在同时使用酒精和大麻影响下的受损驾驶行为及感知到的驾驶规范。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Dec;48(12):2319-2330. doi: 10.1111/acer.15459. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
10
It's Not Just What Parents Say, It's Why They Say It: Students' Perceptions of Parents' Motives for Alcohol Communication.这不仅仅关乎父母说了什么,更在于他们为何这样说:学生对父母进行酒精相关交流动机的认知。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 May;86(3):446-454. doi: 10.15288/jsad.24-00045. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
2
Optimizing personalized normative feedback: the use of gender-specific referents.优化个性化规范反馈:使用特定性别的参照标准。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Mar;68(2):228-37. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.228.
3
Being controlled by normative influences: self-determination as a moderator of a normative feedback alcohol intervention.受规范影响的控制:自我决定作为规范反馈酒精干预的调节因素
Health Psychol. 2006 Sep;25(5):571-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.5.571.
4
Predicting negative drinking consequences: examining descriptive norm perception.预测饮酒的负面后果:审视描述性规范认知。
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 May;67(3):399-405. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.399.
5
Normative misperceptions and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking.规范性误解以及感知规范与饮酒行为的时间先后顺序
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):290-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.290.
6
Development and preliminary validation of the young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire.青年成人酒精后果问卷的编制与初步验证
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jan;67(1):169-77. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.169.
7
Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: a review of the research on personalized normative feedback.采用描述性饮酒规范教育的社会规范方法:个性化规范反馈研究综述
J Am Coll Health. 2006 Jan-Feb;54(4):213-8. doi: 10.3200/JACH.54.4.213-218.
8
Gender differences in drinking: why do they still exist?饮酒方面的性别差异:为何依然存在?
Addiction. 2005 Dec;100(12):1763-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01249.x.
9
Moving beyond the keg party: a daily process study of college student drinking motivations.超越啤酒桶派对:一项关于大学生饮酒动机的日常过程研究
Psychol Addict Behav. 2005 Dec;19(4):392-403. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.4.392.
10
Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom?针对大学生酒精滥用问题的反馈干预措施:是什么、为什么以及针对谁?
Addict Behav. 2005 Jul;30(6):1168-82. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.12.005. Epub 2005 Jan 20.