• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[含氧化银瓣阀的语音假体(Blom-Singer Advantage)的临床应用、生物膜形成、原位使用寿命及适应证]

[Clinical use of a voice prosthesis with a flap valve containing silver oxide (Blom-Singer Advantage), biofilm formation, in-situ lifetime and indication].

作者信息

Kress P, Schäfer P, Schwerdtfeger F-P

机构信息

HNO-Klinik, Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen Trier.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 2006 Dec;85(12):893-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925292. Epub 2006 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1055/s-2006-925292
PMID:16612757
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fungal growth and the resulting leakage through an indwelling voice prosthesis remains the most frequent reason of prosthesis failure and renewal. In some patients leakage caused by fungal growth occurs in very short intervals (below 12 weeks in-situ lifetime) and causes frequent treatments and high costs.

METHODS

The Blom-Singer(R) Advantage voice prosthesis is a new prosthesis type with a modified flange design, a flap valve containing 7 % silver oxide in the silicon matrix and is expected to be resistant against biofilm formation and fungal growth.

PATIENTS

In a clinical trial we used the Blom-Singer(R) Advantage prosthesis in 33 patients with short in-situ lifetimes of their voice prosthesis and analysed the effects on in-situ lifetime and complications statistically.

RESULTS

The clinical use of the Blom-Singer(R) Advantage prosthesis was similar to other types of indwelling voice prosthesis (Provox(R) II, Blom-Singer Indwelling(R)) and did not cause any special problems. Prosthesis specific side effects (i. e. allergy against silver oxide) did not occur. Statistical analysis of the aquired data showed an interindividually changing, but significantly longer in-situ lifetime for the Blom-Singer(R) Advantage prosthesis. The mean device lifetime increased from 36 days (median 36 days) to a mean lifetime of 110 days (median 87 days) with the use of the Blom-Singer(R) Advantage prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a voice prosthesis with a valve containing silver oxide can normalize and even increase the in-situ lifetime in patients with frequent changing procedures caused by fungal growth on the valve. Therefore we recommend the use of this type of voice prosthesis for those patients as reduction of costs and effort results.

摘要

背景

真菌生长以及由此导致的通过植入式语音假体的渗漏仍然是假体失效和更换的最常见原因。在一些患者中,由真菌生长引起的渗漏发生间隔非常短(原位使用寿命低于12周),导致频繁治疗和高昂费用。

方法

Blom-Singer® Advantage语音假体是一种新型假体,其凸缘设计经过改良,瓣膜含有7%氧化银的硅基质,有望抵抗生物膜形成和真菌生长。

患者

在一项临床试验中,我们对33例语音假体原位使用寿命短的患者使用了Blom-Singer® Advantage假体,并对原位使用寿命和并发症的影响进行了统计学分析。

结果

Blom-Singer® Advantage假体的临床使用与其他类型的植入式语音假体(Provox® II、Blom-Singer Indwelling®)相似,未引起任何特殊问题。未出现假体特异性副作用(即对氧化银过敏)。对所得数据的统计分析表明,Blom-Singer® Advantage假体的原位使用寿命在个体间有所变化,但显著延长。使用Blom-Singer® Advantage假体后,平均装置寿命从36天(中位数36天)增加到平均110天(中位数87天)。

结论

对于因瓣膜上真菌生长导致更换程序频繁的患者,使用含氧化银瓣膜的语音假体可使原位使用寿命正常化甚至延长。因此,我们建议为这些患者使用此类语音假体,以降低成本和减少工作量。

相似文献

1
[Clinical use of a voice prosthesis with a flap valve containing silver oxide (Blom-Singer Advantage), biofilm formation, in-situ lifetime and indication].[含氧化银瓣阀的语音假体(Blom-Singer Advantage)的临床应用、生物膜形成、原位使用寿命及适应证]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2006 Dec;85(12):893-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925292. Epub 2006 Apr 10.
2
[Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].全喉切除术后使用发音假体进行嗓音恢复。378个Provox-1、Provox-2和Blom-Singer发音假体的存活时间评估
Laryngorhinootologie. 2001 Nov;80(11):677-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18276.
3
Voice restoration with the advantage tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis.采用优势型气管食管语音假体进行嗓音恢复。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Nov;133(5):681-4. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.009.
4
In vitro biofilm growth on modern voice prostheses.现代语音假体上的体外生物膜生长
Head Neck. 2018 Apr;40(4):763-769. doi: 10.1002/hed.25053. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses.现代语音假体更好吗?749 例语音假体的终生比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;271(1):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2611-0. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
6
Long-term results of Provox ActiValve, solving the problem of frequent candida- and "underpressure"-related voice prosthesis replacements.Provox ActiValve的长期效果,解决了频繁更换与念珠菌和“负压”相关的语音假体的问题。
Laryngoscope. 2008 Feb;118(2):252-7. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318159ebde.
7
[The relationship between the presence of Candida colonization in the oropharynx and on the Blom-Singer voice prosthesis and its effect on the length of prosthesis use].
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2002 Nov-Dec;9(6):410-3.
8
[The custom-fit voice prosthesis, for treatment of periprothetic leakage after tracheoesophageal voice restoration].[定制适配的语音假体,用于气管食管语音恢复后假体周围渗漏的治疗]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2006 Jul;85(7):496-500. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925081. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
9
Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience.喉切除患者嗓音康复的气管食管穿刺(TEP):Blom-singer® 与Provox® 假体对比:我们的经验
Med J Armed Forces India. 2007 Jan;63(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80098-0. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
10
[The costs for different voice prostheses depending on the lifetime].[不同语音假体的成本取决于其使用寿命]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2013 Jun;92(6):389-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1337951. Epub 2013 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Fungal Attachment-Resistant Polymers for the Additive Manufacture of Medical Devices.用于医疗器械增材制造的抗真菌附着聚合物。
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024 Oct 9;16(40):54508-54519. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c04833. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Sustained release varnish containing chlorhexidine for prevention of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation on voice prosthesis surface: an in vitro study.含氯己定的缓释漆预防声门上假体表面变形链球菌生物膜形成的体外研究。
Int Microbiol. 2022 Jan;25(1):177-187. doi: 10.1007/s10123-021-00205-w. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3
Device Life of the Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Revisited.
再探气管食管发音假体的使用寿命
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan 1;143(1):65-71. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2771.
4
Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses.现代语音假体更好吗?749 例语音假体的终生比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;271(1):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2611-0. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
5
Tracheostomy cannulas and voice prosthesis.气管造口套管和发音假体。
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;8:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/cto000057. Epub 2011 Mar 10.