• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience.喉切除患者嗓音康复的气管食管穿刺(TEP):Blom-singer® 与Provox® 假体对比:我们的经验
Med J Armed Forces India. 2007 Jan;63(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80098-0. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
2
[Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].全喉切除术后使用发音假体进行嗓音恢复。378个Provox-1、Provox-2和Blom-Singer发音假体的存活时间评估
Laryngorhinootologie. 2001 Nov;80(11):677-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18276.
3
Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses.现代语音假体更好吗?749 例语音假体的终生比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;271(1):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2611-0. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
4
Prospective randomized comparative study of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: Blom-Singer versus Provox.气管食管语音假体的前瞻性随机对照研究:Blom-Singer与Provox对比
Laryngoscope. 1998 Oct;108(10):1561-5. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199810000-00026.
5
[Speech rehabilitation using Provox voice prosthesis].[使用Provox语音假体进行言语康复]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2005;59(2):225-8.
6
[Clinical use of a voice prosthesis with a flap valve containing silver oxide (Blom-Singer Advantage), biofilm formation, in-situ lifetime and indication].[含氧化银瓣阀的语音假体(Blom-Singer Advantage)的临床应用、生物膜形成、原位使用寿命及适应证]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2006 Dec;85(12):893-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925292. Epub 2006 Apr 10.
7
Management of voice prosthesis leakage with Blom-Singer large esophage and tracheal flange voice prostheses.Blom-Singer 大食管及气管隆凸型喉假体治疗喉假体漏的管理。
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013 Apr;130(2):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Nov 24.
8
[Voice rehabilitation with the Provox system after total laryngectomy].全喉切除术后使用Provox系统进行嗓音康复
Sb Lek. 1997;98(4):287-99.
9
Incidence of tracheo-oesophageal fistulas after primary voice rehabilitation with the Provox or the Eska-Herrmann voice prosthesis.使用Provox或Eska-Herrmann语音假体进行初次语音康复后气管食管瘘的发生率。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Jul;258(5):240-2. doi: 10.1007/s004050100352.
10
Complications following tracheoesophageal puncture: a tertiary hospital experience.气管食管造口术相关并发症:一家三甲医院的经验。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010 Jul;39(7):565-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Sealing the Breach: A Surgical Solution for Tracheoesophageal Fistula With a Simple Two-Layer Closure.封堵缺口:一种采用简单双层缝合治疗气管食管瘘的手术解决方案。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 8;16(6):e61934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61934. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Voice Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy: A Regional Cancer Centre Experience and Review of Literature.喉切除术后的嗓音康复:一个地区癌症中心的经验及文献综述
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):518-523. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01707-w. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Analysis of Factors Affecting the Longevity of Voice Prosthesis Following Total Laryngectomy with a Review of Literature.全喉切除术后发音假体使用寿命影响因素分析及文献综述
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;9(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/s13193-017-0700-z. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
Device Life of the Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Revisited.再探气管食管发音假体的使用寿命
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jan 1;143(1):65-71. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2771.

本文引用的文献

1
[Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy using the Provox voice prosthesis].[使用Provox发音假体进行全喉切除术后的语音康复]
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2003 Nov;106(11):1093-9. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.106.1093.
2
A comparison of survival lifetime of the Provox and the Provox2 voice prosthesis.Provox和Provox2语音假体的存活寿命比较。
J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Nov;117(11):875-8. doi: 10.1258/002221503322542881.
3
A new problem-solving indwelling voice prosthesis, eliminating the need for frequent Candida- and "underpressure"-related replacements: Provox ActiValve.一种新型的解决问题的植入式语音假体,无需频繁因念珠菌和“负压”相关问题进行更换:Provox ActiValve。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2003 Oct;123(8):972-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480310015371.
4
[Quality of life for patients after laryngectomy and surgical voice rehabilitation. Experience with the Provox prosthesis].[喉切除术后及手术语音康复患者的生活质量。使用Provox假体的经验]
HNO. 2003 Jun;51(6):467-72. doi: 10.1007/s00106-002-0736-3. Epub 2003 Mar 27.
5
Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Provox voice prosthesis in South Africa.南非使用Provox发音假体进行喉切除术后的语音康复。
J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Jan;117(1):56-9. doi: 10.1258/002221503321046658.
6
[Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis].全喉切除术后使用发音假体进行嗓音恢复。378个Provox-1、Provox-2和Blom-Singer发音假体的存活时间评估
Laryngorhinootologie. 2001 Nov;80(11):677-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18276.
7
A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single Institution's experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses.318例喉切除术后患者十年的嗓音康复:单一机构持续应用Provox植入式发音假体的经验
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Nov;126(11):1320-8. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.11.1320.
8
Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis.Provox低阻力植入式语音假体的空气动力学特性
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250(7):375-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00180379.
9
The Indian experience with immediate tracheoesophageal puncture for voice restoration.印度即刻气管食管穿刺恢复发声的经验。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;252(4):209-14. doi: 10.1007/BF00179913.
10
An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy.一种喉切除术后恢复嗓音的内镜技术。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980 Nov-Dec;89(6 Pt 1):529-33. doi: 10.1177/000348948008900608.

喉切除患者嗓音康复的气管食管穿刺(TEP):Blom-singer® 与Provox® 假体对比:我们的经验

Tracheo-esophageal Puncture (TEP) for Voice Rehabilitation in Laryngectomised Patients Blom-singer® Vs Provox® Prosthesis : Our Experience.

作者信息

Ramalingam Wvbs, Chikara D, Rajagopal G, Mehta A R, Sarkar S

机构信息

Senior Advisor (ENT and Head & Neck Surgery), Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt-10.

Ex-Classified Specialist (ENT), Command Hospital (Central Command), Lucknow.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2007 Jan;63(1):15-8. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80098-0. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80098-0
PMID:27407929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4921708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stage III and IV cancers of larynx and hypopharynx often require total laryngectomy which leaves the patient with severe communication handicap. In such laryngectomised patients tracheo-esophageal puncture is the best way for voice rehabilitation using either Blom-Singer® prosthesis or Provox® indwelling valve.

METHODS

A prospective comparative study of Blom-Singer® prosthesis and Provox® indwelling valves placed in Tracheo-esophageal Punctures (TEP) for voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy was carried out at the Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai and Malignant Diseases Treatment Centre of Armed Forces, to assess their efficacy. This report comprises of our experience in 41 (39 males and two females) laryngtectomees who underwent TEP of which 15 patients were fitted with low pressure Blom-Singer® prostheses and 26 with Provox® indwelling prostheses.

RESULTS

Prostheses related problems like granuloma formation, leakage, candidal growth over the valves and prosthetic decay were significantly less in the patients fitted with Provox® prosthesis. Dislodgement of prosthesis with closure of the tract or persistent fistula formation and creation of false passage, while reinsertion were problems encountered in the Blom-Singer group. After three months, speech assessment revealed a better quality of voice production and patient compliance in maintaining the prosthesis in the case of Provox® indwelling valve.

CONCLUSION

In Indian scenario where illitracy amongst the patients hinders in maintainence of Blom-Singer® prosthesis, Provox® indwelling value is an appropriate choice for voice rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期喉癌及下咽癌通常需要进行全喉切除术,这会给患者带来严重的交流障碍。在这类喉切除患者中,气管食管穿刺是使用Blom-Singer®假体或Provox®留置瓣膜进行语音康复的最佳方法。

方法

在孟买的塔塔纪念医院和武装部队恶性疾病治疗中心,对全喉切除术后用于语音康复的气管食管穿刺(TEP)中植入的Blom-Singer®假体和Provox®留置瓣膜进行了一项前瞻性对比研究,以评估其疗效。本报告包含了我们对41例(39例男性和2例女性)接受TEP的喉切除患者的经验,其中15例患者安装了低压Blom-Singer®假体,26例安装了Provox®留置假体。

结果

安装Provox®假体的患者中,假体相关问题如肉芽肿形成、渗漏、瓣膜上念珠菌生长和假体腐烂明显较少。Blom-Singer组遇到的问题包括假体移位伴通道闭合或持续性瘘管形成以及再插入时假通道的形成。三个月后,语音评估显示,对于Provox®留置瓣膜,语音质量更好,患者在维持假体方面的依从性更高。

结论

在印度,患者的文盲状态阻碍了Blom-Singer®假体的维护,Provox®留置瓣膜是语音康复的合适选择。