Suppr超能文献

几种临床评分工具在有机磷中毒患者中的评估。

Evaluation of several clinical scoring tools in organophosphate poisoned patients.

作者信息

Sungurtekin Hülya, Gürses Ercan, Balci Canan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(2):121-6. doi: 10.1080/15563650500514350.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) as predictors of severity of organophosphate poisoning (OPP).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 48 patients with OPP who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 24 h between 1997 and 2004. Demographic, laboratory, survival data and on day one APACHE II, III, SAPS II and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were recorded, and correlations between these scores and severity of poisoning were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were evaluated. Mechanical ventilation was required by 58% of patients. The mean APACHE II, III and SAPS II values were 11.5 +/- 7.21, 42.1 +/- 24.49 and 25.1 +/- 15.76, respectively. Total dose and duration of atropine and of pralidoxime therapy, length of ICU stay and mortality all correlated with these clinical scoring tools.

CONCLUSIONS

The APACHE II, III and SAPS II clinical scoring tools seem to predict the severity of organophosphate poisoning, and may have prognostic value.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II、III以及简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)作为有机磷中毒(OPP)严重程度预测指标的价值。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了1997年至2004年间入住重症监护病房(ICU)至少24小时的48例OPP患者。记录患者的人口统计学、实验室检查、生存数据以及入院第1天的APACHE II、III、SAPS II和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分,并分析这些评分与中毒严重程度之间的相关性。

结果

共评估了48例患者。58%的患者需要机械通气。APACHE II、III和SAPS II的平均分值分别为11.5±7.21、42.1±24.49和25.1±15.76。阿托品和氯解磷定治疗的总剂量、持续时间、ICU住院时间和死亡率均与这些临床评分工具相关。

结论

APACHE II、III和SAPS II临床评分工具似乎可以预测有机磷中毒的严重程度,可能具有预后价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验